Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PGWCX vs RGACX
PGWCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts PGWCX vs RGACX
PGWCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PGWCX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PGWCX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. PGWCX (1.93B). PGWCX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . PGWCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: PGWCX (42 years) vs RGACX (24 years). PGWCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. PGWCX (20.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGWCX: RGACX (250) vs PGWCX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.49 vs. PGWCX (-3.77). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 14.93 vs. PGWCX (-22.74).
| PGWCX | RGACX | PGWCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.93 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.93 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.944 | 8.832 | 11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.93B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.77 | 5.49 | -69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.58 | 44.64 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.74 | 14.93 | -152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.80 | 104.49 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement