Investors seeking thematic exposure to essential resources increasingly evaluate specialized ETFs that address water sustainability and critical minerals for the energy transition. Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) and Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM) do not compete directly but instead offer complementary strategies targeting related yet distinct segments of the broader resources landscape. PHO concentrates on U.S. water infrastructure and purification technologies, while SETM spans global mining equities tied to materials powering electrification. Comparing these funds highlights differences in geographic focus, sector breadth, expense structures, and positioning within evolving macro trends such as infrastructure investment and supply-chain resilience.
Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index. The fund typically invests at least 90% of its assets in common stocks and depositary receipts of companies involved in water conservation, purification, and related services. It holds approximately 37 securities, with top holdings generally including companies such as those in water utilities, equipment, and treatment technologies. Sector allocations center on industrials and utilities, reflecting the water resources theme. The expense ratio stands at 0.59%. The index undergoes quarterly rebalancing and annual reconstitution. PHO maintains a standard open-end structure with no leverage, providing straightforward exposure to the U.S. water sector.
Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund designed to track the Nasdaq Sprott Critical Materials Index. The fund invests at least 80% of its assets in global securities of companies deriving significant revenue from mining, exploration, production, or supply of critical materials including uranium, copper, lithium, nickel, cobalt, and rare earths. It typically holds 100–120 constituents, with top holdings spanning producers in these metals. Allocations concentrate in the materials sector across developed and emerging markets. The expense ratio is 0.65%. The index rebalances semi-annually. SETM employs a standard open-end structure without leverage, delivering pure-play access to the critical materials supply chain.
Both ETFs operate within resource-intensive themes shaped by long-term infrastructure needs and the global shift toward electrification. Water resources face steady demand from population growth, urbanization, and regulatory requirements for treatment and conservation. Critical materials experience pressure from expanding electricity generation, transmission, and storage requirements, alongside supply constraints in mining and refining. Macro drivers include capital expenditure on energy projects, trade policies affecting mineral sourcing, and technological advancements in batteries and renewables. Sector risks encompass commodity price volatility, regulatory changes in environmental standards, and geopolitical factors influencing mining operations and export controls. These dynamics support sustained interest in specialized thematic vehicles without reliance on short-term fluctuations.
In recent market cycles, PHO has demonstrated relatively stable behavior tied to consistent utility and infrastructure spending patterns, with lower sensitivity to commodity swings. SETM has exhibited greater volatility aligned with metals price movements and energy transition investment flows during periods of policy support or demand surges. Relative positioning shows PHO offering defensive characteristics within a narrower U.S. focus, while SETM provides broader global diversification across cyclical materials that can amplify gains or losses during sector rotations. Earnings cycles of holdings in each fund reflect distinct drivers—regulatory and infrastructure spending for PHO versus commodity demand and production volumes for SETM—resulting in differentiated responses to interest rate environments and macroeconomic shifts.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors comparing thematic ETFs like PHO and SETM may find the tool useful for uncovering additional ideas aligned with their research.
Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) due to its lower expense ratio, concentrated yet stable U.S.-focused holdings, and defensive thematic alignment with enduring infrastructure demand. SETM offers compelling breadth in critical materials but carries a higher cost structure and greater exposure to cyclical commodity dynamics. Final selection depends on individual investor objectives regarding geographic scope, sector volatility tolerance, and allocation size within a diversified portfolio.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| PHO | SETM | PHO / SETM | |
| Gain YTD | 0.542 | 17.306 | 3% |
| Net Assets | 1.99B | 619M | 322% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.65 | 91% |
| Turnover | 34.00 | 55.00 | 62% |
| Yield | 0.57 | 1.31 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 4 years | - |
| PHO | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LMVYX | 33.52 | 0.22 | +0.66% |
| Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value I | |||
| SGGIX | 95.79 | 0.09 | +0.09% |
| DWS Large Cap Focus Growth Inst | |||
| GCMAX | 40.12 | 0.03 | +0.07% |
| Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value A | |||
| MINFX | 43.66 | -0.20 | -0.46% |
| MFS International Intrinsic Equity R2 | |||
| FRVDX | 41.50 | -0.90 | -2.12% |
| Fidelity Advisor Real Estate M | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHO has been closely correlated with XYL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PHO jumps, then XYL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PHO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHO | 100% | -0.41% | ||
| XYL - PHO | 70% Closely correlated | -2.04% | ||
| MWA - PHO | 69% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| FERG - PHO | 66% Loosely correlated | +2.32% | ||
| FELE - PHO | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| GRC - PHO | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
More | ||||