Intraday BUY SELL Signals
42 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PHO vs WAT
PHO vs WAT Comparison
Open Charts PHO vs WAT
PHO vs WAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PHO vs. WAT commentary
Sep 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PHO is a Hold and WAT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WAT: Fundamental Ratings
WAT | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PHO | WAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% | 15 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
PHO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHO has been loosely correlated with FERG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHO jumps, then FERG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PHO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHO | 100% | +0.15% | ||
| FERG - PHO | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| FELE - PHO | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| TRMB - PHO | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| WAT - PHO | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| IDXX - PHO | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.71% | ||
More | ||||
WAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WAT has been closely correlated with A. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WAT jumps, then A could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAT | 100% | +0.54% | ||
| A - WAT | 66% Closely correlated | +3.50% | ||
| RVTY - WAT | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| TMO - WAT | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| BRKR - WAT | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| CRL - WAT | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.34% | ||
More | ||||