PHYS
Price
$32.23
Change
-$0.20 (-0.62%)
Updated
Sep 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
14.75B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SLV
Price
$57.05
Change
-$0.47 (-0.82%)
Updated
Sep 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
30.87B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PHYS vs SLV

PHYS vs SLV Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 01, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) vs. iShares Silver Trust (SLV)

Key Takeaways

  • Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) provides direct exposure to physical gold bullion through a closed-end trust structure, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) offers exposure to physical silver via a grantor trust.
  • Both funds hold only the underlying precious metal with no equities or derivatives, resulting in pure commodity price tracking but differing volatility profiles due to gold’s lower historical volatility compared with silver.
  • Expense ratios favor PHYS at approximately 0.39% versus SLV at 0.50%, reflecting structural differences in management and custody costs.
  • Neither fund maintains traditional sector allocations or multiple holdings; each represents 100% exposure to a single commodity, making them complementary rather than competing vehicles within the precious metals space.
  • Performance drivers center on macroeconomic factors such as inflation expectations, interest rate movements, and geopolitical risk, with silver exhibiting greater sensitivity to industrial demand cycles.
  • Structural characteristics include full physical allocation for both, with no rebalancing required beyond custody and redemption mechanics.

Introduction

Investors seeking precious metals exposure often evaluate gold and silver vehicles side by side. Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV) do not compete directly as they track distinct commodities, yet both serve investors pursuing inflation hedging, portfolio diversification, or tactical commodity allocations. The comparison highlights structural nuances, cost differences, and relative positioning within the broader precious metals sector amid ongoing macroeconomic uncertainty.

Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) Overview

Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) is structured as a closed-end trust that invests substantially all assets in fully allocated, unencumbered physical gold bullion stored in secure vaults. The trust tracks the spot price of gold and maintains zero equity holdings. It features an expense ratio of approximately 0.39%. As a closed-end vehicle, PHYS trades on exchanges with potential premiums or discounts to net asset value. The structure emphasizes physical ownership without leverage or derivatives, appealing to investors prioritizing direct bullion exposure over equity-based gold miners.

iShares Silver Trust (SLV) Overview

iShares Silver Trust (SLV) operates as a grantor trust that holds physical silver bullion to reflect the performance of silver prices before expenses. The fund maintains 100% allocation to silver with no additional holdings or sector diversification. Its expense ratio stands at 0.50%. SLV trades on NYSE Arca and provides convenient exchange-traded access to silver without requiring physical storage by investors. The grantor trust structure offers tax treatment distinct from traditional mutual funds or exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The precious metals sector responds to macroeconomic catalysts including inflation trends, real interest rate expectations, and geopolitical developments. Gold typically benefits from safe-haven demand during uncertainty, while silver’s dual role in investment and industrial applications introduces additional sensitivity to economic growth and manufacturing cycles. Capital flows into physical bullion vehicles often increase during periods of monetary policy easing or elevated global risk. Regulatory frameworks for physical commodity trusts remain stable, with custody and audit requirements supporting investor confidence in both gold and silver products.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, gold exposure via PHYS has demonstrated lower volatility relative to silver, consistent with historical patterns where silver amplifies both upside and downside moves due to its industrial leverage. Relative positioning favors gold during risk-off environments driven by monetary easing or geopolitical tension, while silver may outperform in strong economic expansions supported by solar, electronics, and automotive demand. Both vehicles exhibit high correlation to their underlying metal prices, with differences in expense drag and liquidity profiles influencing net investor returns over multi-month periods.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic edge to Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) due to its lower expense ratio, established physical allocation framework, and gold’s historically more consistent role as a portfolio diversifier during varied macroeconomic regimes. Silver exposure through SLV offers complementary cyclical upside but carries higher cost and volatility considerations.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
PHYS vs. SLV commentary
Sep 17, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PHYS is a Hold and SLV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLV has more net assets: 30.9B vs. PHYS (14.7B). PHYS has a higher annual dividend yield than SLV: PHYS (-1.787) vs SLV (-10.695). PHYS was incepted earlier than SLV: PHYS (17 years) vs SLV (20 years).
PHYSSLVPHYS / SLV
Gain YTD-1.787-10.69517%
Net Assets14.7B30.9B48%
Total Expense RatioN/A0.50-
Turnover2.24N/A-
Yield0.000.00-
Fund Existence17 years20 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PHYSSLV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
PHYS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SLV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PALU56.500.33
+0.59%
Direxion Daily PANW Bull 2X Shares
VSMV60.87-0.24
-0.40%
VictoryShares US Mult-Fctr Mnmm Vltl ETF
OMFL69.45-0.34
-0.49%
Invesco Russell 1000® Dynamic Mltfct ETF
JUST108.34-0.60
-0.55%
Goldman Sachs JUST US Large Cap Eq ETF
HUTG13.00-1.34
-9.35%
Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF