Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PIBAX vs RLBAX
PIBAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts PIBAX vs RLBAX
PIBAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PIBAX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PIBAX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. PIBAX (1.1B). PIBAX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: PIBAX (1.76) vs RLBAX (1.14). PIBAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: PIBAX (30 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than PIBAX (1.12). PIBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PIBAX: RLBAX (250) vs PIBAX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.80 vs. PIBAX (13.07). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.17 vs. PIBAX (14.27).
| PIBAX | RLBAX | PIBAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.32 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.32 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.601 | 9.354 | 81% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 279B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 1.14 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.07 | 16.80 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.96 | 42.23 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.27 | 31.17 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.69 | 77.06 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement