Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PIBAX vs RLBFX
PIBAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PIBAX vs RLBFX
PIBAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PIBAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PIBAX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. PIBAX (1.09B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than PIBAX: RLBFX (2.02) vs PIBAX (1.76). PIBAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PIBAX (30 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). PIBAX (1.12) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). PIBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. RLBFX (50.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PIBAX: RLBFX (250) vs PIBAX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.07 vs. PIBAX (12.42). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.80 vs. PIBAX (14.16).
| PIBAX | RLBFX | PIBAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.30 | 333% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.30 | 373% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.583 | 9.536 | 80% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 288B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 2.02 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.42 | 17.07 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.36 | 45.61 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.16 | 37.80 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.61 | 93.65 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement