Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PICEX vs RNWHX
PICEX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts PICEX vs RNWHX
PICEX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PICEX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PICEX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. PICEX (426M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than PICEX: RNWHX (1.14) vs PICEX (0.44). PICEX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: PICEX (20 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). PICEX (2.42) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. PICEX (23.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PICEX: RNWHX (250) vs PICEX (2500). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.31 vs. PICEX (-6.36). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 14.31 vs. PICEX (-45.59).
| PICEX | RNWHX | PICEX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 0.72 | 307% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.42 | 0.72 | 336% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.707 | 13.641 | -71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 426M | 90.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 1.14 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.36 | 20.31 | -31% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.13 | 47.80 | -9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -45.59 | 14.31 | -319% |
| Returns for 10 years | -24.70 | 114.40 | -22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement