PICK
Price
$66.83
Change
+$0.96 (+1.46%)
Updated
Aug 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
2.42B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
REMX
Price
$79.02
Change
-$0.73 (-0.92%)
Updated
Aug 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
2.33B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PICK vs REMX

PICK vs REMX Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) vs. VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX)

Key Takeaways

  • PICK offers broad exposure to global metals and mining producers with significantly lower costs and greater diversification through hundreds of holdings, while REMX provides concentrated access to the niche rare earth and strategic metals sector with fewer holdings.
  • Both ETFs are passive index trackers, but PICK follows a diversified metals and mining benchmark, whereas REMX targets a specialized index focused on rare earth elements critical for advanced technologies.
  • PICK maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.39%, enhancing long-term cost efficiency for investors seeking broad sector exposure compared to REMX’s 0.53% expense ratio.
  • REMX exhibits higher concentration risk due to its smaller number of holdings (approximately 30–35) and heavier weighting in top positions, contrasting with PICK’s more balanced allocation across 200+ securities.
  • In the current market environment, both ETFs respond to commodity cycles and supply chain dynamics, but PICK benefits from broader industrial metals demand while REMX is more sensitive to technology-driven rare earth needs.
  • Structural differences position PICK as a diversified core holding in materials and REMX as a thematic satellite allocation for investors targeting specific strategic metals trends.

Introduction

Investors seeking exposure to the materials sector often evaluate ETFs that capture metals and mining activity. The iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) and the VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) represent distinct approaches within this space. PICK delivers diversified global metals and mining coverage, while REMX narrows focus to rare earth and strategic metals essential for high-tech applications. These funds do not compete directly but serve as complementary or alternative options depending on whether an investor prioritizes broad sector representation or targeted thematic exposure to critical minerals.

iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) Overview

The iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) is a passive ETF that seeks to track the MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers Investable Market Index. It holds approximately 230–255 securities, providing diversified exposure to companies engaged in the extraction and production of metals including copper, iron ore, and aluminum. Top holdings typically include BHP, Rio Tinto, Freeport-McMoRan (FCX), Glencore, and Anglo American, with the top 10 positions accounting for a substantial but not dominant share of assets. The fund maintains an expense ratio of 0.39% and features a broad sector allocation concentrated in basic materials. Its rebalancing follows the underlying index methodology, supporting liquidity and structural stability for long-term investors.

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) Overview

The VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) is a passive ETF designed to replicate the performance of the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. It holds approximately 30–35 securities, offering concentrated exposure to companies involved in producing, refining, and recycling rare earth and strategic metals. Prominent holdings often include Albemarle (ALB), MP Materials (MP), Lynas Rare Earths, and China Northern Rare Earth, with the top 10 holdings representing over 60% of assets. The ETF carries an expense ratio of 0.53% and maintains a 100% allocation to basic materials. Rebalancing aligns with the index rules, emphasizing the fund’s focused thematic strategy.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The global metals and mining sector continues to face evolving demand patterns driven by energy transition needs, supply chain diversification, and technological advancement. Broad metals producers benefit from infrastructure and industrial activity, while rare earth and strategic metals experience pressure from electric vehicle, renewable energy, and electronics supply chains. Macro factors such as interest rate trajectories, geopolitical tensions affecting mining regions, and regulatory developments around critical minerals influence both segments. Capital flows into thematic materials strategies have remained measured amid commodity price volatility, with investors balancing growth opportunities against sector-specific risks including environmental regulations and extraction costs.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, PICK has demonstrated more stable relative positioning due to its diversified holdings across industrial metals, resulting in lower volatility compared to the more concentrated REMX. REMX has shown greater sensitivity to shifts in rare earth demand tied to technology sectors and supply disruptions from key producing regions. During periods of sector rotation favoring broad materials, PICK’s broader exposure has supported more consistent participation, while REMX has benefited from targeted rallies in strategic metals but experienced sharper drawdowns in risk-off environments. These dynamics highlight differing risk profiles: PICK for balanced materials allocation and REMX for higher-beta thematic exposure.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to discover additional opportunities aligned with your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to the iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). Its lower expense ratio, substantially greater diversification across hundreds of holdings, and broader exposure to the metals and mining sector provide a more resilient profile relative to the higher-cost, concentrated VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). While REMX offers compelling thematic access to rare earth trends, PICK’s cost efficiency and risk-mitigating breadth align with durable positioning criteria in the current environment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
PICK vs. REMX commentary
Aug 26, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PICK is a StrongBuy and REMX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PICK (2.42B) and REMX (2.33B) have similar net assets . PICK has a higher annual dividend yield than REMX: PICK (29.380) vs REMX (7.887). PICK was incepted earlier than REMX: PICK (15 years) vs REMX (16 years). PICK (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than REMX (0.53). REMX has a higher turnover PICK (10.00) vs PICK (10.00).
PICKREMXPICK / REMX
Gain YTD29.3807.887373%
Net Assets2.42B2.33B104%
Total Expense Ratio0.390.5374%
Turnover10.0074.0014%
Yield2.231.98113%
Fund Existence15 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PICKREMX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PICK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
REMX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BNDD96.050.70
+0.73%
Quadratic Deflation ETF
AFIF9.42N/A
N/A
Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF
PEPS32.54N/A
N/A
Parametric Equity Plus ETF
TAN48.32-1.00
-2.03%
Invesco Solar ETF
OILU52.30-1.40
-2.61%
MicroSectorsTM Oil&Gs Exp&Pd 3X Lvg ETNs

PICK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PICK has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PICK jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PICK
1D Price
Change %
PICK100%
+0.26%
BHP - PICK
90%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
RIO - PICK
89%
Closely correlated
-0.47%
MT - PICK
72%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
CMP - PICK
55%
Loosely correlated
-5.77%
LAR - PICK
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.90%
More

REMX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, REMX has been closely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if REMX jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To REMX
1D Price
Change %
REMX100%
-1.24%
LAR - REMX
75%
Closely correlated
-1.90%
ALB - REMX
71%
Closely correlated
-1.21%
SQM - REMX
69%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
MP - REMX
66%
Closely correlated
-4.38%
SLI - REMX
66%
Loosely correlated
-2.02%
More