PICK
Price
$61.63
Change
-$1.72 (-2.72%)
Updated
Sep 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
2.56B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
REMX
Price
$68.91
Change
-$1.65 (-2.34%)
Updated
Sep 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
2.07B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PICK vs REMX

PICK vs REMX Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) vs. VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX)

Key Takeaways

  • PICK provides broad exposure to global metals and mining producers excluding gold and silver, tracking an index with approximately 250 holdings focused on diversified metals, steel, and copper.
  • REMX offers targeted exposure to rare earth and strategic metals companies, with a concentrated portfolio of around 35 holdings and significant allocation to lithium and rare earth producers.
  • PICK maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.39% compared to REMX at 0.53%, supporting cost efficiency for long-term investors seeking broader sector diversification.
  • REMX exhibits higher concentration risk and greater sensitivity to China-related supply dynamics, while PICK delivers more balanced geographic and sub-sector exposure across developed and emerging markets.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed equity vehicles in the materials sector, but PICK emphasizes industrial metals production while REMX focuses on critical minerals essential for technology and defense applications.
  • Structural differences position PICK for diversified metals cycle participation and REMX for thematic bets on rare earth supply constraints and strategic mineral demand.

Introduction

Investors seeking exposure to the global metals and mining sector often compare PICK and REMX due to their complementary yet distinct approaches within critical materials. These exchange-traded funds (ETFs) do not compete directly but instead provide alternative exposure within the broader materials space: PICK targets diversified industrial metals producers, while REMX narrows focus to rare earth and strategic metals. In an environment of rising demand for metals tied to electrification, advanced technology, and supply chain resilience, the two vehicles offer differentiated strategies for investors pursuing sector participation with varying risk and thematic profiles.

iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) Overview

The iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers Ex Gold & Silver Investable Market Index. The index measures the performance of companies primarily involved in the extraction and production of diversified metals, aluminum, steel, and other industrial materials, excluding gold and silver. The ETF holds approximately 250 securities, with top holdings typically including BHP, Rio Tinto, Freeport-McMoRan (FCX), Glencore, and Anglo American. Sector allocations emphasize diversified metals and mining, followed by steel and copper. PICK carries an expense ratio of 0.39% and provides global exposure across developed and emerging markets, with notable weightings in Australia, the United States, and the United Kingdom. The fund employs physical replication and quarterly index rebalancing.

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) Overview

The VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) is a passively managed fund designed to replicate the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. The index tracks companies engaged in producing, refining, and recycling rare earth and strategic metals and minerals. REMX maintains a concentrated portfolio of approximately 35 holdings, with top positions often including Albemarle (ALB), China Northern Rare Earth Group, Lynas Rare Earths, MP Materials (MP), and Pilbara Minerals. The fund allocates 100% to the materials sector and features elevated exposure to China and Australia. REMX carries an expense ratio of 0.53% and utilizes physical replication with quarterly rebalancing. Its narrow focus results in higher concentration compared to broader metals ETFs.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The metals and mining sector continues to experience structural demand from electric vehicle production, renewable energy infrastructure, and advanced electronics, alongside supply considerations related to geopolitical tensions and resource nationalism. Rare earth elements and strategic metals remain central to defense technologies and high-performance magnets, with ongoing efforts to diversify supply chains away from dominant producers. Industrial metals such as copper and steel benefit from broader infrastructure and manufacturing cycles. Regulatory developments around critical minerals lists in major economies and potential trade restrictions add complexity. Both ETFs operate within this environment of commodity price volatility and strategic importance of secure mineral supplies.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, PICK has demonstrated relatively steadier participation in broad industrial metals price movements due to its diversified holdings and lower concentration. REMX has shown greater sensitivity to specific rare earth price fluctuations and regional developments, particularly those affecting Chinese producers, resulting in higher volatility. Performance differentials often trace to commodity trends, with PICK more aligned to steel and copper cycles and REMX tied to lithium and rare earth dynamics. Geographic positioning further differentiates outcomes, as REMX carries heavier emerging-market concentration that can amplify responses to regional policy shifts compared to PICK’s broader developed-market weighting.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights on ETFs like PICK and REMX may benefit from exploring the platform’s analytical capabilities.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a modest probabilistic preference to PICK in the current environment. Its lower expense ratio, greater number of holdings, and diversified exposure across industrial metals sub-sectors support a more balanced risk profile relative to REMX’s concentrated thematic focus. REMX’s higher costs and narrower mandate may appeal in scenarios of pronounced rare earth momentum, yet PICK’s broader positioning offers comparatively resilient participation across metals cycles with lower single-name and regional concentration.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
PICK vs. REMX commentary
Sep 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PICK is a Buy and REMX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PICK has more net assets: 2.56B vs. REMX (2.07B). PICK has a higher annual dividend yield than REMX: PICK (21.071) vs REMX (-6.751). PICK was incepted earlier than REMX: PICK (15 years) vs REMX (16 years). PICK (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than REMX (0.53). REMX has a higher turnover PICK (10.00) vs PICK (10.00).
PICKREMXPICK / REMX
Gain YTD21.071-6.751-312%
Net Assets2.56B2.07B123%
Total Expense Ratio0.390.5374%
Turnover10.0074.0014%
Yield2.031.67121%
Fund Existence15 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PICKREMX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
89%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
PICK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
REMX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DIVZ38.180.19
+0.51%
Polen Dividend Income ETF
FFLV28.76-0.02
-0.07%
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF
FIXP19.55-0.04
-0.20%
FolioBeyond Enhanced Fixed Inc Prm ETF
BUYW14.56-0.03
-0.21%
Main BuyWrite ETF
JPY39.62-0.12
-0.30%
Lazard Japanese Equity ETF

REMX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, REMX has been closely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if REMX jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To REMX
1D Price
Change %
REMX100%
-2.31%
LAR - REMX
76%
Closely correlated
+1.54%
ALB - REMX
70%
Closely correlated
-2.12%
SQM - REMX
68%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
MP - REMX
66%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
SLI - REMX
66%
Loosely correlated
-6.28%
More