Investors weighing metals and mining exposure often face a choice between breadth and thematic conviction. PICK and REMX illustrate this tension well. They do not compete directly; rather, they represent two different approaches to the same broad materials universe. PICK captures the diversified global mining complex, while REMX focuses on the strategic minerals tied to electrification, defense, and supply-chain security. With critical minerals in the policy spotlight and base metals responding to global industrial demand, understanding how these funds differ in structure, cost, and risk is essential for accurate relative positioning.
PICK is a passively managed fund that tracks the MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers ex Gold and Silver Investable Market Index. As the name implies, the index excludes gold and silver miners, concentrating instead on companies involved in the extraction or production of diversified metals, aluminum, and steel, as well as copper and other industrial minerals. The fund is market-cap weighted and generally holds between roughly 250 and 300 securities.
Top holdings typically include large diversified miners such as BHP Group, Rio Tinto, Glencore, Anglo American, and Vale, alongside U.S.-listed names like FCX (Freeport-McMoRan), NUE (Nucor), and STLD (Steel Dynamics). The portfolio is overwhelmingly concentrated in the materials sector, with more than 90% of assets allocated there. Its expense ratio is 0.39%. The fund is considered non-diversified under U.S. securities law, though its broad global reach across developed and emerging markets provides far more name-level diversification than a thematic peer.
REMX is a passively managed, thematic fund that seeks to replicate the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. It invests in companies involved in mining, refining, and recycling of rare earth elements and strategic metals, including lithium, tungsten, molybdenum, and related minerals. The portfolio is far more concentrated, typically holding roughly 30–37 names.
Top holdings commonly include ALB (Albemarle), MP (MP Materials), and SQM (Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile), alongside non-U.S. issuers such as Lynas Rare Earths, China Northern Rare Earth Group, Pilbara Minerals, Xiamen Tungsten, Jinduicheng Molybdenum, and Almonty Industries. The top ten holdings can account for well over half of total assets, and the fund carries meaningful country concentration in Australia, the United States, and China. Its net expense ratio is approximately 0.53%, with a gross expense ratio near 0.58%.
Both funds sit within the global materials complex, but they respond to different catalysts. PICK is driven by broad industrial demand, infrastructure spending, steel and aluminum pricing, and copper's role in electrification and grid buildout. REMX is more tightly linked to specific themes: electric-vehicle battery supply chains, permanent magnets for wind turbines and defense applications, and government efforts to diversify rare earth processing away from concentrated capacity.
Geopolitics plays an outsized role for REMX. Export controls on critical minerals, strategic stockpiling, and reshoring initiatives have periodically boosted or pressured rare earth and lithium equities. Meanwhile, lithium markets have faced oversupply and price weakness in recent cycles, adding volatility. For PICK, macroeconomic growth expectations, China's industrial activity, and commodity price trends across iron ore, copper, and steel are the dominant drivers. Both funds carry sector-specific risks, including regulatory changes, commodity cycles, and environmental and permitting constraints.
In recent weeks and months, the two funds have exhibited distinct performance dynamics consistent with their structures. PICK's diversified exposure means its returns tend to track broad metals pricing and global industrial sentiment, with copper, iron ore, and steel names providing a mix of cyclical sensitivity. Its larger number of holdings and heavy large-cap weighting generally translate into lower volatility relative to a concentrated thematic fund.
REMX, by contrast, has been more sensitive to swings in lithium and rare earth equities. Its concentrated portfolio, meaningful exposure to smaller and mid-sized issuers, and heavy weighting toward a handful of bellwethers can amplify both upside and downside during sector rotations. Periods of optimism around electrification and supply-chain security have favored REMX, while oversupply concerns in lithium and regulatory uncertainty have weighed on it. Relative positioning between the two funds therefore hinges less on whether an investor wants metals exposure and more on how much single-theme risk they are willing to accept.
Tickeron's AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of securities using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener is designed to surface trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, making it a practical resource for comparing funds like PICK and REMX within the broader materials universe. Explore the AI Screener to refine your own sector research.
Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron's AI would likely favor PICK for most risk-conscious investors seeking metals exposure. Its lower expense ratio, broader diversification across hundreds of holdings, and heavy weighting toward established large-cap miners offer a more stable cost and risk profile. REMX's concentrated, thematic design can generate stronger momentum during favorable critical-minerals cycles, but its narrower portfolio and elevated single-stock and single-country exposure introduce materially higher volatility. While REMX may appeal to investors with a strong conviction in rare earths and battery materials, the AI's probabilistic assessment leans toward PICK for consistency of structure, diversification, and cost efficiency over a full market cycle.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
PICK moved below its 50-day moving average on September 23, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 37 of 39 similar past instances, the stock price decreased further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 13, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on PICK as a result. In 70 of 84 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 83%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for PICK turned negative on October 14, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 44 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 36 of the 44 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 82%.
The 10-day moving average for PICK crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 23, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 11 of 12 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PICK declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 85%.
The Aroon Indicator for PICK entered a downward trend on October 23, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 2 days, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 6 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +3.19% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PICK advanced for three days, in 304 of 341 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 89%.
PICK may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Moving lower for three straight days is viewed as a bearish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future declines. Considering data from situations where REMX declined for three days, in 314 of 343 cases, the price declined further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The Aroon Indicator for REMX entered a downward trend on October 23, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Indicator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 20 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an Uptrend is expected.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 21 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +0.92% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where REMX advanced for three days, in 272 of 301 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
REMX may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
| PICK | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 89% | 20 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 88% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EUV | 20.27 | 0.19 | +0.95% |
| Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF (EUV) | |||
| RB | 46.57 | N/A | N/A |
| ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Buffer ETF (RB) | |||
| HQH | 20.27 | -0.14 | -0.69% |
| abrdn Healthcare Investors | |||
| STNC | 37.05 | -0.39 | -1.03% |
| Hennessy Sustainable ETF (STNC) | |||
| QPUX | 6.39 | -0.11 | -1.69% |
| Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF (QPUX) | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PICK has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PICK jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PICK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PICK | 100% | -0.33% | ||
| BHP - PICK | 91% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| RIO - PICK | 90% Closely correlated | -0.86% | ||
| MT - PICK | 72% Closely correlated | -1.25% | ||
| CSTM - PICK | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.21% | ||
| IDR - PICK | 60% Loosely correlated | -3.67% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, REMX has been closely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if REMX jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To REMX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| REMX | 100% | -0.27% | ||
| LAR - REMX | 76% Closely correlated | +1.44% | ||
| LAC - REMX | 74% Closely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| ALB - REMX | 72% Closely correlated | +1.22% | ||
| SQM - REMX | 71% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| MP - REMX | 70% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
More | ||||