Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PIGFX vs RGABX
PIGFX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts PIGFX vs RGABX
PIGFX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PIGFX vs. RGABX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PIGFX is a Buy and RGABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. PIGFX (6.35B). PIGFX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . PIGFX was incepted earlier than RGABX: PIGFX (24 years) vs RGABX (24 years). RGABX (1.38) is less costly to investors than PIGFX (1.01). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. PIGFX (26.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than PIGFX: RGABX (250) vs PIGFX (2500). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.39 vs. PIGFX (-4.49). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 7.60 vs. PIGFX (-2.18).
| PIGFX | RGABX | PIGFX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.38 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.38 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.430 | 5.948 | 58% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.35B | 361B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.49 | 6.39 | -70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.82 | 38.15 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.18 | 7.60 | -29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.74 | 92.74 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement