Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PIGFX vs RGAHX
PIGFX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts PIGFX vs RGAHX
PIGFX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PIGFX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PIGFX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. PIGFX (6.33B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than PIGFX: RGAHX (0.40) vs PIGFX (0.00). PIGFX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: PIGFX (24 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). PIGFX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. PIGFX (26.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PIGFX: RGAHX (250) vs PIGFX (2500). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.43 vs. PIGFX (-7.29). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 16.49 vs. PIGFX (-3.73).
| PIGFX | RGAHX | PIGFX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.44 | 225% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.44 | 230% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.948 | 7.244 | 68% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.33B | 357B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.29 | 4.43 | -165% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.19 | 39.88 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.73 | 16.49 | -23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.43 | 102.84 | 77% |