It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PINS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileYELP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PINS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YELP’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
PINS (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а +2.37% price change this week, while YELP (@Internet Software/Services) price change was -0.86% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was +11.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.41%.
PINS is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
YELP is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
PINS | YELP | PINS / YELP | |
Capitalization | 24B | 2.69B | 892% |
EBITDA | -104.17M | 149M | -70% |
Gain YTD | -10.232 | -26.891 | 38% |
P/E Ratio | 312.50 | 29.39 | 1,063% |
Revenue | 3.06B | 1.34B | 228% |
Total Cash | 2.51B | 446M | 563% |
Total Debt | 196M | 87.3M | 225% |
YELP | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 55 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PINS | YELP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago75% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago62% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago75% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago70% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago63% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago79% | 7 days ago66% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago77% | 11 days ago68% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PINS has been loosely correlated with SNAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PINS jumps, then SNAP could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PINS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PINS | 100% | +1.46% | ||
SNAP - PINS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
CARG - PINS | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
SMWB - PINS | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
META - PINS | 31% Poorly correlated | +2.26% | ||
YELP - PINS | 31% Poorly correlated | +2.91% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YELP has been loosely correlated with SSTK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YELP jumps, then SSTK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To YELP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
YELP | 100% | +2.91% | ||
SSTK - YELP | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.60% | ||
TRUE - YELP | 43% Loosely correlated | +2.49% | ||
CARG - YELP | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
GETY - YELP | 40% Loosely correlated | +2.22% | ||
DASH - YELP | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.93% | ||
More |