Advertisement
CARG vs PINS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CarGurus (CARG) vs. Pinterest (PINS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CARG offers a lower trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 18.6 compared to PINS's 32.9, indicating potentially better value in recent market activity.
- CARG boasts higher profit margins at 17.2% and return on equity (ROE) of 43%, surpassing PINS's 9.9% and 8.8% respectively.
- PINS demonstrates stronger revenue growth of 14.3% quarterly versus CARG's 5.5% year-over-year, highlighting differing growth trajectories.
- Both stocks have shown resilience with positive analyst ratings, but CARG has gained about 9% over the recent month amid earnings beats.
- PINS benefits from a larger market cap of $12.8B and lower debt-to-equity ratio of 5.5%, offering scale and balance sheet strength.
- Recent momentum favors CARG with YTD returns around 5%, while PINS stands at 23% YTD amid upcoming earnings anticipation.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines CARG and PINS, two tech-driven platforms in consumer-facing sectors: automotive marketplaces and visual discovery networks. Both operate in digital ecosystems reliant on user traffic and monetization through listings and ads, making them relevant for investors tracking relative performance in online marketplaces and social media stocks. Traders seeking insights into valuation, growth potential, and market positioning amid shifting consumer behaviors will find value here, especially as economic conditions influence spending on vehicles and discretionary discovery tools.
CARG Overview and Recent Performance
CarGurus, Inc. (CARG) runs a leading online automotive marketplace connecting buyers and sellers across the U.S. and internationally, offering tools for vehicle research, pricing, and dealer interactions. In recent weeks, the stock has traded around $36-38, reflecting a roughly 9% gain over the past month and positioning within its 52-week range of $25-39. Sentiment has been buoyed by a Q4 2025 earnings beat, with EPS of $0.63 topping estimates by 8.6%, alongside robust profitability metrics like 17% profit margins and strong free cash flow of $219M trailing twelve months (TTM). Influences include steady consumer interest in used vehicles and platform enhancements, though broader auto market softness tempers gains. Analysts maintain buy ratings with targets up to $42.
PINS Overview and Recent Performance
Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) operates a visual discovery platform where users save and share ideas for shopping, recipes, and lifestyle inspiration, monetized primarily through advertising. Recently, shares have hovered near $20, within a 52-week range of $14-40, with YTD gains around 23% but mixed monthly momentum ahead of Q1 2026 earnings on May 4. Q4 2025 results showed EPS of $0.67 beating expectations, supported by revenue of $4.22B TTM and investments in AI-driven shopping and connected TV ads. However, concerns over ad pricing and monetization have pressured sentiment, offset by a solid balance sheet with $2.47B cash and low 5.5% debt-to-equity. Analysts project $0.22 EPS for Q1, with buy ratings and targets averaging $23.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 available on the platform, which collectively trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots exhibit diverse strategies like trend following, swing trading, and signal agents, with annualized returns ranging from 24% to 164%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7. Timeframes vary from 1 day to 50 days, appealing to short-term traders and long-term investors alike. High performers include bots targeting semiconductors and AI infrastructure with profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 16. Explore these bots to align with current market conditions and enhance your trading edge.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CARG and PINS contrast in business models: CARG earns from dealer subscriptions and listings in the cyclical auto sector, while PINS relies on ad revenue in consumer internet services. Growth drivers differ, with PINS showing 14% quarterly revenue expansion versus CARG’s steadier 5.5%, but CARG leads in margins and ROE. Recent momentum tilts to CARG with monthly gains and earnings consistency, while PINS faces ad market volatility. Risks include auto sales sensitivity for CARG (beta 1.32) and competition for PINS (beta 0.88). Market sentiment remains positive for both, with PINS’s larger $13B cap providing scale advantages over CARG’s $3.3B.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models would currently lean toward CARG for its trend consistency, superior profitability (17% margins, 43% ROE), and attractive valuation at 18.6 P/E amid recent positive momentum and analyst support. While PINS offers growth potential through AI enhancements and scale, its higher multiple and upcoming earnings introduce more uncertainty. This positioning suggests higher probability of near-term outperformance for CARG in stable market conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CARG is a Buy and PINS is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CARG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePINS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CARG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PINS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CARG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PINS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CARG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PINS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CARG (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а +7.62% price change this week, while PINS (@Internet Software/Services) price change was -8.58% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -2.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was -21.34%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was -1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.67%.
Reported Earning Dates
CARG is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
PINS is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Automotive Aftermarket (-2.10% weekly)The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).
@Internet Software/Services (-1.19% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
| CARG | PINS | CARG / PINS | |
| Capitalization | 2.71B | 10.9B | 25% |
| EBITDA | 283M | 350M | 81% |
| Gain YTD | -21.591 | -24.681 | 87% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.83 | 40.63 | 39% |
| Revenue | 938M | 4.37B | 21% |
| Total Cash | 72M | 1.3B | 6% |
| Total Debt | 188M | 1.21B | 16% |
CARG | PINS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 95 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 21 | 76 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PINS's Valuation (66) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as CARG (83) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that PINS’s stock grew similarly to CARG’s over the last 12 months.
CARG's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as PINS (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that CARG’s stock grew similarly to PINS’s over the last 12 months.
CARG's SMR Rating (21) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PINS (76) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that CARG’s stock grew somewhat faster than PINS’s over the last 12 months.
PINS's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as CARG (61) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that PINS’s stock grew similarly to CARG’s over the last 12 months.
PINS's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for CARG (99) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that PINS’s stock grew significantly faster than CARG’s over the last 12 months.
| CARG | PINS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 27 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | N/A |
Advertisement
PINS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PINS has been loosely correlated with CARG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PINS jumps, then CARG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PINS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PINS | 100% | -3.80% | ||
| CARG - PINS | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| THRY - PINS | 41% Loosely correlated | -3.71% | ||
| DASH - PINS | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| Z - PINS | 39% Loosely correlated | -5.64% | ||
| YELP - PINS | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.79% | ||
More | ||||