Advertisement
GS vs PIPR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Goldman Sachs Group (GS) vs. Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- GS commands a massive market cap of approximately $275 billion, dwarfing PIPR's $6.3 billion, reflecting greater scale and diversification.
- Both stocks have delivered comparable YTD returns near 6%, but GS significantly outperforms over one year with 73% gains versus PIPR's 51%.
- GS reported robust Q1 2026 earnings with 14% revenue growth and strong return on equity (ROE, a measure of profitability relative to shareholders' equity) of nearly 20%.
- PIPR exhibits higher ROE at 19.6% and trades at a premium P/E ratio of 22.2 versus GS's 16.9, signaling expectations for niche growth.
- GS benefits from lower beta (1.31 vs. 1.48), indicating relatively less market volatility exposure.
- Analysts rate both as buys, with target prices suggesting modest upside for PIPR (to $95) and stability for GS (around $935).
Introduction
Investment banking stocks like GS and PIPR offer exposure to mergers and acquisitions (M&A), capital markets, and trading activity amid evolving economic conditions. GS, a global powerhouse, contrasts with PIPR, a middle-market specialist focused on advisory services. This comparison suits traders eyeing sector momentum, investors assessing relative performance in a high-interest-rate environment, and those balancing scale against niche efficiency. Recent market activity highlights shifts in sentiment driven by earnings and deal flow.
GS Overview and Recent Performance
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) operates as a leading global investment bank, providing services in investment banking, fixed income, currencies, and commodities (FICC) trading, equities, and asset and wealth management with assets under management (AUM, total value of investments managed) exceeding trillions. In recent market activity, GS shares have shown resilience, trading near $927 within a 52-week range of $531 to $985. Strong Q1 2026 results fueled gains, with revenue up 14% year-over-year to $17.2 billion and net earnings of $5.4 billion, driven by surging investment banking fees from M&A and equity underwriting amid improved deal sentiment. Profit margins stand at 29%, bolstering positive investor outlook despite broader volatility in trading revenues.
PIPR Overview and Recent Performance
Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR) is a boutique investment firm specializing in M&A advisory, public finance, equity sales and trading, and fixed income for middle-market clients across healthcare, technology, and consumer sectors. Shares recently hover around $88 in a 52-week band of $59 to $95, reflecting steady performance. Recent weeks have seen modest fluctuations ahead of Q1 earnings on May 1, 2026, with focus on advisory revenues amid selective deal activity. The firm maintains solid fundamentals, including 15% profit margins and ROE of 20%, supported by strategic hires in healthcare investment banking. Market positioning remains stable, with YTD gains mirroring peers despite higher beta exposure.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform’s top AI-powered trading bots, curated from over 350 bots that analyze thousands of tickers across diverse strategies like swing trading, scalping, and long-term holds. These bots employ technical and fundamental analysis, operating on timeframes from 5 minutes to daily, with risk levels from low to high and performance metrics including win rates often above 60%, average returns ranging 20-100% over backtested periods, and controlled drawdowns under 15%. Only the most consistent performers in current volatility suit the trending list—currently featuring 25 bots optimized for stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Traders can copy signals or portfolios directly. Explore Trending AI Robots to align bots with your GS or PIPR focus.
Head-to-Head Comparison
GS’ diversified model spans global IB, trading (net interest income or NII from lending), and AUM growth, contrasting PIPR’s advisory-heavy focus with less trading volatility but narrower revenue streams. Growth drivers for GS include scale in mega-deals and consumer banking expansion; PIPR leverages niche expertise in sectors like healthcare M&A. Recent momentum favors GS post-earnings, with one-month gains around 8% versus PIPR’s steadier path. Risk factors: GS faces trading headwinds and non-performing loans (NCO ratio), while PIPR contends with deal-cycle sensitivity. Both share capital markets exposure, but GS garners broader sentiment from institutional flows.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently favor GS for its superior trend consistency, recent earnings catalysts, higher profit margins, and relative stability in market positioning. While PIPR offers attractive ROE and upside potential post-earnings, GS’ scale and momentum provide a probabilistic edge in the near term amid favorable IB recovery signals.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GS is a StrongBuy and PIPR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GS’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whilePIPR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- GS’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
- PIPR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PIPR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PIPR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +7.52% price change this week, while PIPR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -4.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.21%.
Reported Earning Dates
GS is expected to report earnings on Jul 14, 2026.
PIPR is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.39% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| GS | PIPR | GS / PIPR | |
| Capitalization | 309B | 5.23B | 5,908% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.287 | -6.901 | -323% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.44 | 19.52 | 100% |
| Revenue | 60.4B | 1.95B | 3,091% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 435B | 116M | 375,000% |
GS | PIPR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 42 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 20 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 7 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 15 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | 62 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PIPR's Valuation (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GS (83) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew significantly faster than GS’s over the last 12 months.
GS's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as PIPR (20) in the null industry. This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.
GS's SMR Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PIPR (42) in the null industry. This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PIPR’s over the last 12 months.
GS's Price Growth Rating (15) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PIPR (52) in the null industry. This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PIPR’s over the last 12 months.
GS's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PIPR (62) in the null industry. This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PIPR’s over the last 12 months.
| GS | PIPR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 6 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 14 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 83% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| USNG | 36.05 | 0.98 | +2.79% |
| Amplify Samsung U.S. Natrl Gas InfrasETF | |||
| FTEC | 300.51 | 3.83 | +1.29% |
| Fidelity MSCI Information Tech ETF | |||
| FCG | 29.46 | 0.14 | +0.48% |
| First Trust Natural Gas ETF | |||
| TAIL | 10.72 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
| Cambria Tail Risk ETF | |||
| PYPY | 26.74 | -0.22 | -0.80% |
| YieldMax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
GS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GS has been closely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GS jumps, then MS could also see price increases.
PIPR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIPR has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PIPR jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PIPR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIPR | 100% | +0.19% | ||
| RJF - PIPR | 78% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| EVR - PIPR | 77% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| MC - PIPR | 76% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| PWP - PIPR | 75% Closely correlated | -3.18% | ||
| SF - PIPR | 73% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
More | ||||