Advertisement
PIPR vs SF
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR) vs. Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both PIPR and SF operate in the capital markets sector, delivering strong earnings beats in recent quarters, with SF reporting record Q1 2026 revenue.
- SF boasts a larger market capitalization of approximately $11.9 billion compared to PIPR's $6.3 billion, alongside a lower trailing P/E ratio (price-to-earnings) of 15 versus 22.
- PIPR shows higher recent growth, with quarterly revenue up 37.6% and EPS (earnings per share) growth of 65% year-over-year, outpacing SF's 18.4% revenue growth.
- SF exhibits lower volatility with a beta of 1.10 versus PIPR's 1.48, appealing to stability-focused investors.
- Over the past year, PIPR delivered stronger returns of 18.4% compared to SF's 12.1%.
- Recent market activity reflects positive sentiment for both, driven by robust investment banking and wealth management segments.
Introduction
Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR) and Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) are prominent players in the capital markets industry, offering investment banking, wealth management, and trading services. This stock comparison evaluates their recent performance, financial metrics, and market positioning amid evolving economic conditions. Traders seeking momentum opportunities and investors prioritizing stability or value may find insights here, particularly as both firms benefit from heightened M&A (mergers and acquisitions) activity and advisory demand in recent market activity. Understanding their contrasts aids informed relative performance assessments in the financial services landscape.
PIPR Overview and Recent Performance
Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR) is a full-service investment bank focused on middle-market M&A, equity and debt capital markets, and institutional sales in sectors like healthcare, technology, and consumer. In recent weeks, PIPR's stock has traded around $88, near the upper end of its 52-week range of $58-$95, reflecting resilience post its strong Q4 2025 earnings beat where EPS reached $6.88 against expectations of $4.72. Sentiment has been buoyed by nine consecutive quarters of year-over-year growth, robust quarterly revenue expansion of 37.6%, and elevated ROE (return on equity) of 19.6%. However, higher beta indicates sensitivity to market swings, with recent pullbacks amid broader sector rotations.
SF Overview and Recent Performance
Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) provides brokerage, investment banking, and wealth management through its subsidiaries, emphasizing institutional and retail services across diverse sectors. Trading near $77 within a 52-week range of $55-$90, SF recently posted record Q1 2026 results, surpassing revenue and EPS estimates with 18.4% year-over-year revenue growth and strong margins in investment banking and wealth management. Positive sentiment stems from elevated net revenues and capital returns, though shares dipped slightly post-earnings amid macro concerns. Lower debt/equity and a beta of 1.10 underscore relative stability, supporting steady performance in volatile conditions.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of over 25 top-performing AI trading bots from its library of 351 bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like swing trading, trend following, technical analysis (TA), fundamental analysis (FA), and take-profit/stop-loss corridors, operating on timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes. Standout performers show annualized returns ranging from 15% to over 113%, win rates of 55-87%, profit factors up to 6.9, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 8, with max drawdowns typically under $50,000 on simulated portfolios. Examples include semiconductor-focused bots with 70-100% returns and gold miners agents at 50-60%. Explore these for potential alignment with current market conditions and trading styles.
Head-to-Head Comparison
PIPR and SF share exposure to investment banking fees and wealth management net interest income (NII), but differ in scale and focus. SF’s larger platform drives higher institutional group revenues, while PIPR excels in niche M&A advisory. Growth drivers favor PIPR with superior recent EPS and revenue acceleration, contrasting SF’s value-oriented lower P/E and price-to-book. Recent momentum tilts to SF post its fresh earnings record, though PIPR leads yearly returns. Risk factors include market-dependent fee income for both, with PIPR’s higher beta amplifying volatility versus SF’s steadier profile. Sentiment remains constructive amid sector tailwinds like dealmaking recovery.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors SF over PIPR, citing its recent record Q1 performance, attractive valuation multiples, larger scale, and lower beta for enhanced stability in uncertain markets. While PIPR offers compelling growth momentum, SF’s relative positioning suggests higher probability of near-term outperformance based on trend consistency and catalysts.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PIPR is a Buy and SF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PIPR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PIPR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PIPR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PIPR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
PIPR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +2.83% price change this week, while SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +0.86% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.21%.
Reported Earning Dates
PIPR is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2026.
SF is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-1.65% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| PIPR | SF | PIPR / SF | |
| Capitalization | 5.53B | 11.3B | 49% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.632 | -10.880 | 15% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.62 | 14.38 | 143% |
| Revenue | 1.95B | 5.69B | 34% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 112M | 1.52B | 7% |
PIPR | SF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 16 Undervalued | 62 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 55 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | 21 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 74 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 45 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PIPR's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SF (62) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew somewhat faster than SF’s over the last 12 months.
PIPR's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SF (55) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew somewhat faster than SF’s over the last 12 months.
SF's SMR Rating (21) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as PIPR (41) in the null industry. This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.
PIPR's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as SF (54) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.
PIPR's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as SF (74) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.
| PIPR | SF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 63% | 16 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 66% |
Advertisement
PIPR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIPR has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PIPR jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PIPR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIPR | 100% | -0.04% | ||
| RJF - PIPR | 78% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| EVR - PIPR | 77% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| MC - PIPR | 76% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| PWP - PIPR | 75% Closely correlated | +1.07% | ||
| SF - PIPR | 73% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
More | ||||
SF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SF has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SF jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.