Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PJFAX vs RGAGX
PJFAX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts PJFAX vs RGAGX
PJFAX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PJFAX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PJFAX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. PJFAX (8.24B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than PJFAX: RGAGX (0.51) vs PJFAX (0.00). PJFAX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: PJFAX (31 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). PJFAX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). PJFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PJFAX: RGAGX (250) vs PJFAX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.49 vs. PJFAX (-4.85). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 15.00 vs. PJFAX (-7.03).
| PJFAX | RGAGX | PJFAX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.29 | 334% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.29 | 334% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.663 | 9.321 | 61% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.24B | 353B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.85 | 0.49 | -990% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.80 | 44.65 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.03 | 15.00 | -47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.87 | 110.30 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement