Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PJFM vs VOT
PJFM vs VOT Comparison
Open Charts PJFM vs VOT
PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF
Price$58.85
Change-$1.86 (-3.06%)
Volume$398
Net Assets14.71M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$275.73
Change+$1.17 (+0.43%)
Volume$710
Net Assets33.11B
PJFM vs VOT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PJFM vs. VOT commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PJFM is a Hold and VOT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VOT has more net assets: 33.1B vs. PJFM (14.7M). VOT has a higher annual dividend yield than PJFM: VOT (8.292) vs PJFM (1.333). PJFM was incepted earlier than VOT: PJFM (2 years) vs VOT (19 years). VOT (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than PJFM (0.49). PJFM has a higher turnover VOT (21.00) vs VOT (21.00).
| PJFM | VOT | PJFM / VOT | |
| Gain YTD | 1.333 | 8.292 | 16% |
| Net Assets | 14.7M | 33.1B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.07 | 700% |
| Turnover | 101.00 | 21.00 | 481% |
| Yield | 0.80 | 0.62 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PJFM | VOT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
PJFM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PJFM has been loosely correlated with WSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PJFM jumps, then WSC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PJFM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PJFM | 100% | N/A | ||
| WSC - PJFM | 54% Loosely correlated | -5.29% | ||
| CBRE - PJFM | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| WTFC - PJFM | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.43% | ||
| ALSN - PJFM | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| RL - PJFM | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.28% | ||
More | ||||
VOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VOT has been closely correlated with TRMB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VOT jumps, then TRMB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VOT | 100% | -0.23% | ||
| TRMB - VOT | 84% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| ARES - VOT | 80% Closely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| APO - VOT | 77% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| CCL - VOT | 76% Closely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| OWL - VOT | 76% Closely correlated | +1.02% | ||
More | ||||