Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PJFM vs VOT
PJFM vs VOT Comparison
Open Charts PJFM vs VOT
PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF
Price$60.15
Change-$0.17 (-0.28%)
Volume$599
Net Assets15.03M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$292.08
Change+$0.62 (+0.21%)
Volume$166
Net Assets32.29B
PJFM vs VOT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PJFM vs. VOT commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PJFM is a Buy and VOT is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VOT has more net assets: 32.3B vs. PJFM (15M). VOT has a higher annual dividend yield than PJFM: VOT (14.926) vs PJFM (3.567). PJFM was incepted earlier than VOT: PJFM (2 years) vs VOT (19 years). VOT (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than PJFM (0.49). PJFM has a higher turnover VOT (21.00) vs VOT (21.00).
| PJFM | VOT | PJFM / VOT | |
| Gain YTD | 3.567 | 14.926 | 24% |
| Net Assets | 15M | 32.3B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.07 | 700% |
| Turnover | 101.00 | 21.00 | 481% |
| Yield | 0.79 | 0.62 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PJFM | VOT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 49% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 53% | 13 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
PJFM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PJFM has been loosely correlated with WSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PJFM jumps, then WSC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PJFM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PJFM | 100% | N/A | ||
| WSC - PJFM | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.25% | ||
| WTFC - PJFM | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| ALSN - PJFM | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.31% | ||
| PNFP - PJFM | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| RL - PJFM | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
More | ||||
VOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VOT has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VOT jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VOT | 100% | -0.83% | ||
| ARES - VOT | 81% Closely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| APO - VOT | 79% Closely correlated | +1.20% | ||
| TRMB - VOT | 78% Closely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| OWL - VOT | 78% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CPAY - VOT | 77% Closely correlated | -1.99% | ||
More | ||||