Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PKSCX vs TRQZX
PKSCX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts PKSCX vs TRQZX
PKSCX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PKSCX vs. TRQZX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PKSCX is a Hold and TRQZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 21.1B vs. PKSCX (1.63B). TRQZX pays higher dividends than PKSCX: TRQZX (0.71) vs PKSCX (0.00). PKSCX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: PKSCX (24 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). PKSCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). TRQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.50 vs. PKSCX (13.00). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than PKSCX: TRQZX (0) vs PKSCX (2500). TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.76 vs. PKSCX (-21.44). TRQZX (-22.12) and PKSCX (-22.39) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PKSCX | TRQZX | PKSCX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.61 | 326% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.851 | 0.488 | 379% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.63B | 21.1B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.71 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -21.44 | -5.76 | 372% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.03 | 0.92 | -980% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.39 | -22.12 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers