PLMIU vs RRACF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLMIU is a StrongBuy and RRACF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PLMIU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRRACF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PLMIU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- RRACF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
PLMIU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RRACF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -4.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.91%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (+0.50% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| PLMIU | RRACF | PLMIU / RRACF | |
| Capitalization | N/A | 358M | - |
| EBITDA | 725K | -2.45M | -30% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -2.174 | - |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 53.19 | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 94.7K | 70.7K | 134% |
| Total Debt | 1.25M | 5.56M | 22% |
| PLMIU | RRACF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 16% | 24 days ago 10% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 14% | 24 days ago 9% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
PLMIU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLMIU has been loosely correlated with CXAI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLMIU jumps, then CXAI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLMIU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLMIU | 100% | N/A | ||
| CXAI - PLMIU | 50% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PWUPU - PLMIU | 44% Loosely correlated | -2.37% | ||
| AFAR - PLMIU | 41% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CMCAF - PLMIU | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| RRACF - PLMIU | 36% Loosely correlated | -3.85% | ||
More | ||||
RRACF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RRACF has been closely correlated with BYNOU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RRACF jumps, then BYNOU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RRACF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RRACF | 100% | -3.85% | ||
| BYNOU - RRACF | 66% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| HAIUF - RRACF | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| BUJA - RRACF | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
| PLMIU - RRACF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RFACU - RRACF | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.06% | ||
More | ||||