PLMR
Price
$111.62
Change
-$2.80 (-2.45%)
Updated
Jun 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.96B
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SAFT
Price
$70.45
Change
-$0.34 (-0.48%)
Updated
Jun 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.04B
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PLMR vs SAFT

PLMR vs SAFT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PLMR vs. SAFT commentary
Jun 19, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLMR is a Hold and SAFT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 19, 2026
Stock price -- (PLMR: $114.42 vs. SAFT: $70.79)
Brand notoriety: PLMR and SAFT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PLMR: 86% vs. SAFT: 204%
Market capitalization -- PLMR: $2.96B vs. SAFT: $1.04B
PLMR [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $2.96B. SAFT’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $1.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $125.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $12.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PLMR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSAFT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PLMR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SAFT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SAFT is a better buy in the long-term than PLMR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PLMR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAFT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PLMR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SAFT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PLMR is a better buy in the short-term than SAFT.

Price Growth

PLMR (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +0.95% price change this week, while SAFT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -1.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +1.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

PLMR is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

SAFT is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+1.18% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PLMR($2.96B) has a higher market cap than SAFT($1.04B). SAFT has higher P/E ratio than PLMR: SAFT (16.67) vs PLMR (15.57). SAFT YTD gains are higher at: -6.827 vs. PLMR (-15.012). PLMR (754M) and SAFT (753M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . SAFT has less debt than PLMR: SAFT (61.1M) vs PLMR (297M). SAFT has higher revenues than PLMR: SAFT (1.27B) vs PLMR (980M).
PLMRSAFTPLMR / SAFT
Capitalization2.96B1.04B286%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-15.012-6.827220%
P/E Ratio15.5716.6793%
Revenue980M1.27B77%
Total Cash754M753M100%
Total Debt297M61.1M486%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLMR vs SAFT: Fundamental Ratings
PLMR
SAFT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
226
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6290
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6159
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9348
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5047

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAFT's Valuation (11) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for PLMR (86). This means that SAFT’s stock grew significantly faster than PLMR’s over the last 12 months.

PLMR's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as SAFT (90). This means that PLMR’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

PLMR's SMR Rating (100) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as SAFT (100). This means that PLMR’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

SAFT's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as PLMR (61). This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to PLMR’s over the last 12 months.

SAFT's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLMR (93). This means that SAFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLMR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PLMRSAFT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PLMR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SAFT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CIMCX27.48N/A
N/A
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529C
ESPTX13.67N/A
N/A
UBS International Sustainable Equity P2
BKTSX34.23N/A
N/A
iShares Total US Stock Market Idx K
VYCIX28.83N/A
N/A
Voya Corporate Leaders 100 W
TVRFX86.61-1.32
-1.50%
Thornburg American Opportunities R3

PLMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLMR has been loosely correlated with SKWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLMR jumps, then SKWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLMR
1D Price
Change %
PLMR100%
+0.40%
SKWD - PLMR
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
BOW - PLMR
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
RLI - PLMR
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.41%
SAFT - PLMR
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
HIG - PLMR
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.05%
More

SAFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAFT has been loosely correlated with HMN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAFT jumps, then HMN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAFT
1D Price
Change %
SAFT100%
-0.11%
HMN - SAFT
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
HIG - SAFT
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.05%
TRV - SAFT
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
MCY - SAFT
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.18%
THG - SAFT
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
More