Advertisement
PLMR vs SAFT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLMR is a StrongBuy and SAFT is a Buy.
PLMR | SAFT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 83 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 29 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 30 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SAFT's Valuation (29) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLMR (82). This means that SAFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLMR’s over the last 12 months.
SAFT's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLMR (70). This means that SAFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLMR’s over the last 12 months.
PLMR's SMR Rating (45) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAFT (78). This means that PLMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAFT’s over the last 12 months.
SAFT's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as PLMR (55). This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to PLMR’s over the last 12 months.
SAFT's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLMR (61). This means that SAFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLMR’s over the last 12 months.
| PLMR | SAFT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 46% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 77% | 13 days ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 6 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 36% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PLMR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while SAFT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- PLMR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SAFT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PLMR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAFT’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PLMR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SAFT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
PLMR (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -8.83% price change this week, while SAFT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -4.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.32%.
Reported Earning Dates
PLMR is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
SAFT is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (-4.13% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TINS | 29.21 | N/A | N/A |
| Templeton International Insights ETF (TINS) | |||
| GTO | 44.71 | -0.19 | -0.42% |
| Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO) | |||
| MFDX | 41.85 | -0.23 | -0.54% |
| PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) | |||
| VBCF | 72.34 | -0.43 | -0.59% |
| Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCF) | |||
| BSSX | 23.92 | -0.15 | -0.60% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF (BSSX) | |||
PLMR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLMR has been closely correlated with SKWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PLMR jumps, then SKWD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLMR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLMR | 100% | -0.77% | ||
| SKWD - PLMR | 66% Closely correlated | -2.17% | ||
| RLI - PLMR | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| CNA - PLMR | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| L - PLMR | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| HMN - PLMR | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.84% | ||
More | ||||
SAFT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAFT has been loosely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAFT jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAFT | 100% | +0.06% | ||
| HIG - SAFT | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.46% | ||
| AXS - SAFT | 54% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SIGI - SAFT | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.21% | ||
| PLMR - SAFT | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| UFCS - SAFT | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
More | ||||