Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMACX vs RIDGX
PMACX vs RIDGX Comparison
Open Charts PMACX vs RIDGX
PMACX vs RIDGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMACX vs. RIDGX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMACX is a Hold and RIDGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDGX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. PMACX (10B). PMACX pays higher dividends than RIDGX: PMACX (5.48) vs RIDGX (3.70). PMACX was incepted earlier than RIDGX: PMACX (15 years) vs RIDGX (17 years). PMACX (1.61) is less costly to investors than RIDGX (0.26). RIDGX (65.00) and PMACX (62.00) have comparable annual turnover. RIDGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PMACX: RIDGX (250) vs PMACX (2500). PMACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.80 vs. RIDGX (9.69). PMACX return over 5 years is better than : 57.41 vs. RIDGX (29.37).
| PMACX | RIDGX | PMACX / RIDGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 0.26 | 619% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 0.26 | 619% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.796 | 10.839 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10B | 148B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.48 | 3.70 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.80 | 9.69 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.24 | 43.79 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.41 | 29.37 | 195% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.14 | 62.79 | 188% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement