Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBCX vs RSGFX
PMBCX vs RSGFX Comparison
Open Charts PMBCX vs RSGFX
Victory RS Select Growth C
Price$12.22
Change-$0.14 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets86.39M
PMBCX vs RSGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBCX vs. RSGFX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBCX is a Buy and RSGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBCX has more cash in the bank: 32.9B vs. RSGFX (86.4M). PMBCX (0.00) and RSGFX (0.00) have matching dividends . PMBCX was incepted earlier than RSGFX: PMBCX (19 years) vs RSGFX (18 years). RSGFX (3.68) is less costly to investors than PMBCX (1.75). RSGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.00 vs. PMBCX (10.50). PMBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSGFX: PMBCX (1000) vs RSGFX (2500). RSGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.28 vs. PMBCX (6.87). PMBCX return over 5 years is better than : 39.26 vs. RSGFX (-56.71).
| PMBCX | RSGFX | PMBCX / RSGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 2.18 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 3.68 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.809 | 2.517 | 271% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.9B | 86.4M | 38,079% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.87 | 15.28 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.85 | -18.75 | -207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.26 | -56.71 | -69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.59 | -73.35 | -114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers