Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBCX vs RSGFX
PMBCX vs RSGFX Comparison
Open Charts PMBCX vs RSGFX
Victory RS Select Growth C
Price$12.24
Change+$0.09 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.87M
PMBCX vs RSGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBCX vs. RSGFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBCX is a Hold and RSGFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBCX has more cash in the bank: 30.8B vs. RSGFX (81.9M). PMBCX (0.00) and RSGFX (0.00) have matching dividends . PMBCX was incepted earlier than RSGFX: PMBCX (19 years) vs RSGFX (18 years). RSGFX (3.68) is less costly to investors than PMBCX (1.75). RSGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.00 vs. PMBCX (10.50). PMBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSGFX: PMBCX (1000) vs RSGFX (2500). RSGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.00 vs. PMBCX (-7.81). PMBCX return over 5 years is better than : 16.97 vs. RSGFX (-62.35).
| PMBCX | RSGFX | PMBCX / RSGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 2.18 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 3.68 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.396 | 1.930 | -72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.8B | 81.9M | 37,607% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.81 | 1.00 | -782% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.92 | -15.80 | -170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.97 | -62.35 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.60 | -73.18 | -90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement