Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBCX vs RSGFX
PMBCX vs RSGFX Comparison
Open Charts PMBCX vs RSGFX
PMBCX vs RSGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBCX vs. RSGFX commentary
Aug 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBCX is a Hold and RSGFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBCX has more cash in the bank: 23.1B vs. RSGFX (86.4M). PMBCX (0.00) and RSGFX (0.00) have matching dividends . PMBCX was incepted earlier than RSGFX: PMBCX (20 years) vs RSGFX (19 years). RSGFX (4.31) is less costly to investors than PMBCX (1.71). RSGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. PMBCX (13.70). PMBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSGFX: PMBCX (1000) vs RSGFX (2500). RSGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.21 vs. PMBCX (-13.54). PMBCX return over 5 years is better than : -9.92 vs. RSGFX (-61.48).
| PMBCX | RSGFX | PMBCX / RSGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 2.18 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 4.31 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.346 | 17.073 | -14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.1B | 86.4M | 26,736% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.54 | -2.21 | 614% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.85 | 26.73 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.92 | -61.48 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.83 | -72.18 | -76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement