Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBCX vs SAGCX
PMBCX vs SAGCX Comparison
Open Charts PMBCX vs SAGCX
PMBCX vs SAGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBCX vs. SAGCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBCX is a Hold and SAGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBCX has more cash in the bank: 21.3B vs. SAGCX (4.09B). PMBCX (0.00) and SAGCX (0.00) have matching dividends . PMBCX was incepted earlier than SAGCX: PMBCX (20 years) vs SAGCX (33 years). SAGCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than PMBCX (1.71). SAGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. PMBCX (13.70). PMBCX (1000) and SAGCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PMBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -20.85 vs. SAGCX (-79.01). PMBCX return over 5 years is better than : -16.30 vs. SAGCX (-93.87).
| PMBCX | SAGCX | PMBCX / SAGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.86 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.86 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.623 | -0.760 | 1,135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.3B | 4.09B | 521% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.85 | -79.01 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.06 | -85.46 | -5% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.30 | -93.87 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.54 | -94.97 | -51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement