PMCCF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
Capitalization
7.95M
RRDMF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.01 (-5.56%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
Capitalization
41.85M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PMCCF vs RRDMF

Header iconPMCCF vs RRDMF Comparison
Open Charts PMCCF vs RRDMFBanner chart's image
Peloton Minerals
Price$0.05
Change-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization7.95M
Royal Road Minerals
Price$0.17
Change-$0.01 (-5.56%)
Volume$50.02K
Capitalization41.85M
PMCCF vs RRDMF Comparison Chart in %
PMCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RRDMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PMCCF vs. RRDMF commentary
Oct 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMCCF is a Hold and RRDMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 08, 2025
Stock price -- (PMCCF: $0.05 vs. RRDMF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: PMCCF and RRDMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PMCCF: 14% vs. RRDMF: 82%
Market capitalization -- PMCCF: $7.95M vs. RRDMF: $41.85M
PMCCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $7.95M. RRDMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $41.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $111.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PMCCF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRRDMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PMCCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RRDMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PMCCF is a better buy in the long-term than RRDMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PMCCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RRDMF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PMCCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • RRDMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RRDMF is a better buy in the short-term than PMCCF.

Price Growth

PMCCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -4.96% price change this week, while RRDMF (@Precious Metals) price change was +0.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2313.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.42% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRDMF($41.9M) has a higher market cap than PMCCF($7.95M). RRDMF YTD gains are higher at: 67.550 vs. PMCCF (18.804). PMCCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.45M vs. RRDMF (-3.7M). RRDMF has more cash in the bank: 4.67M vs. PMCCF (36.3K). RRDMF has less debt than PMCCF: RRDMF (23.6K) vs PMCCF (340K). PMCCF (0) and RRDMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
PMCCFRRDMFPMCCF / RRDMF
Capitalization7.95M41.9M19%
EBITDA-1.45M-3.7M39%
Gain YTD18.80467.55028%
P/E Ratio13.66N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash36.3K4.67M1%
Total Debt340K23.6K1,441%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PMCCF vs RRDMF: Fundamental Ratings
PMCCF
RRDMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8185
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
598
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5335
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1187
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RRDMF's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCCF (89). This means that RRDMF’s stock grew similarly to PMCCF’s over the last 12 months.

RRDMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCCF (100). This means that RRDMF’s stock grew similarly to PMCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PMCCF's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RRDMF (98). This means that PMCCF’s stock grew significantly faster than RRDMF’s over the last 12 months.

RRDMF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCCF (53). This means that RRDMF’s stock grew similarly to PMCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PMCCF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RRDMF (87). This means that PMCCF’s stock grew significantly faster than RRDMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PMCCFRRDMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PMCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RRDMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FICO1879.5529.37
+1.59%
Fair Isaac Corp
CKX10.900.05
+0.46%
CKX Lands
OSIS249.38-1.79
-0.71%
OSI Systems
OSBC17.25-0.28
-1.60%
Old Second Bancorp
TNXP23.00-1.22
-5.04%
Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding Corp

PMCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PMCCF and RRDMF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PMCCF and RRDMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMCCF
1D Price
Change %
PMCCF100%
-8.03%
RRDMF - PMCCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-7.12%
GROY - PMCCF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SSRM - PMCCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
PAAS - PMCCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
NG - PMCCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.24%
More

RRDMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RRDMF and PAFRF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RRDMF and PAFRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RRDMF
1D Price
Change %
RRDMF100%
-7.12%
PAFRF - RRDMF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMCCF - RRDMF
24%
Poorly correlated
-8.03%
WGXRF - RRDMF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.48%
BLAGF - RRDMF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
RUPRF - RRDMF
15%
Poorly correlated
-3.12%
More