Advertisement
PMEC vs RTO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMEC is a Hold and RTO is a Hold.
RTO | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| PMEC | RTO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 64% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PMEC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while RTO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PMEC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- RTO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PMEC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RTO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PMEC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- RTO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
PMEC (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -16.54% price change this week, while RTO (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was -3.65% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -3.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.40%.
Reported Earning Dates
RTO is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Office Equipment/Supplies (-3.41% weekly)The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
Advertisement
PMEC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PMEC and TRNS have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PMEC and TRNS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PMEC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMEC | 100% | -3.48% | ||
| TRNS - PMEC | 14% Poorly correlated | +1.99% | ||
| TRI - PMEC | 12% Poorly correlated | +2.09% | ||
| GNS - PMEC | 11% Poorly correlated | -6.42% | ||
| RTO - PMEC | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.25% | ||
| TH - PMEC | 9% Poorly correlated | +3.85% | ||
More | ||||
RTO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RTO has been loosely correlated with CTAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RTO jumps, then CTAS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RTO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RTO | 100% | +0.25% | ||
| CTAS - RTO | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| RBA - RTO | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| EXPO - RTO | 31% Poorly correlated | +6.85% | ||
| REZI - RTO | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.11% | ||
| MSA - RTO | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.65% | ||
More | ||||