PNFP
Price
$97.37
Change
-$1.98 (-1.99%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
7.55B
44 days until earnings call
UMBF
Price
$124.47
Change
+$0.84 (+0.68%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
9.45B
51 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PNFP vs UMBF

Header iconPNFP vs UMBF Comparison
Open Charts PNFP vs UMBFBanner chart's image
Pinnacle Financial Partners
Price$97.37
Change-$1.98 (-1.99%)
Volume$1.16M
Capitalization7.55B
UMB Financial
Price$124.47
Change+$0.84 (+0.68%)
Volume$692.81K
Capitalization9.45B
PNFP vs UMBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PNFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PNFP vs. UMBF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNFP is a Buy and UMBF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (PNFP: $97.37 vs. UMBF: $124.47)
Brand notoriety: PNFP and UMBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PNFP: 78% vs. UMBF: 124%
Market capitalization -- PNFP: $7.55B vs. UMBF: $9.45B
PNFP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $7.55B. UMBF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $9.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PNFP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUMBF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PNFP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UMBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UMBF is a better buy in the long-term than PNFP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PNFP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMBF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PNFP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UMBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PNFP is a better buy in the short-term than UMBF.

Price Growth

PNFP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.15% price change this week, while UMBF (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

PNFP is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

UMBF is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UMBF($9.45B) has a higher market cap than PNFP($7.55B). UMBF has higher P/E ratio than PNFP: UMBF (14.10) vs PNFP (12.95). UMBF YTD gains are higher at: 11.137 vs. PNFP (-14.283). UMBF has more cash in the bank: 917M vs. PNFP (339M). UMBF has less debt than PNFP: UMBF (439M) vs PNFP (2.2B). UMBF has higher revenues than PNFP: UMBF (1.9B) vs PNFP (1.68B).
PNFPUMBFPNFP / UMBF
Capitalization7.55B9.45B80%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-14.28311.137-128%
P/E Ratio12.9514.1092%
Revenue1.68B1.9B89%
Total Cash339M917M37%
Total Debt2.2B439M502%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PNFP vs UMBF: Fundamental Ratings
PNFP
UMBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2189
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4732
SMR RATING
1..100
1111
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5843
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8638
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PNFP's Valuation (61) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UMBF (61). This means that PNFP’s stock grew similarly to UMBF’s over the last 12 months.

UMBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PNFP (47). This means that UMBF’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

UMBF's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PNFP (11). This means that UMBF’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

UMBF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PNFP (58). This means that UMBF’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

UMBF's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNFP (86). This means that UMBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PNFPUMBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PNFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RWIBX71.980.33
+0.46%
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc R2
DFSPX15.31N/A
N/A
DFA Intl Sustainability Core 1
JDSAX24.19N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Small Cap Value A
BLNIX13.56N/A
N/A
Meeder Balanced Institutional
MADAX27.04N/A
N/A
Madison Dividend Income A

PNFP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNFP has been closely correlated with SNV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PNFP jumps, then SNV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNFP
1D Price
Change %
PNFP100%
-1.99%
SNV - PNFP
90%
Closely correlated
-1.23%
FNB - PNFP
86%
Closely correlated
-1.85%
WTFC - PNFP
86%
Closely correlated
-0.20%
ONB - PNFP
85%
Closely correlated
-0.91%
UMBF - PNFP
84%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
More

UMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMBF has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMBF jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UMBF
1D Price
Change %
UMBF100%
+0.68%
FNB - UMBF
91%
Closely correlated
-1.85%
HWC - UMBF
90%
Closely correlated
-0.57%
WTFC - UMBF
90%
Closely correlated
-0.20%
ONB - UMBF
89%
Closely correlated
-0.91%
ASB - UMBF
89%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
More