Ad is loading...
PNGAX vs TRIGX
PNGAX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts PNGAX vs TRIGX
Putnam International Value A
Price$15.34
Change-$0.08 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets656.89M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$20.13
Change-$0.09 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.48B
PNGAX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNGAX vs. TRIGX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNGAX is a StrongBuy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 14.5B vs. PNGAX (657M). PNGAX (2.27) and TRIGX (2.21) have matching dividends . PNGAX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: PNGAX (29 years) vs TRIGX (26 years). PNGAX (1.27) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). PNGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). PNGAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: PNGAX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.48 vs. PNGAX (12.97). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 113.55 vs. PNGAX (101.57).
| PNGAX | TRIGX | PNGAX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.87 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.87 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.439 | 18.776 | 88% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 657M | 14.5B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.27 | 2.21 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.97 | 17.48 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.08 | 55.92 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 101.57 | 113.55 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.73 | 57.41 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...