Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNGAX vs TRIGX
PNGAX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts PNGAX vs TRIGX
PNGAX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNGAX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jul 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNGAX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. PNGAX (1.23B). TRIGX pays higher dividends than PNGAX: TRIGX (2.38) vs PNGAX (1.68). PNGAX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: PNGAX (30 years) vs TRIGX (28 years). PNGAX (1.18) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.81). PNGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). PNGAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: PNGAX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.01 vs. PNGAX (18.91). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 91.03 vs. PNGAX (64.21).
| PNGAX | TRIGX | PNGAX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.81 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.81 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.545 | 12.405 | 85% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.23B | 16.9B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.68 | 2.38 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.91 | 27.01 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.20 | 86.73 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.21 | 91.03 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.35 | 156.31 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement