Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNOYX vs RGAFX
PNOYX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts PNOYX vs RGAFX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Y
Price$146.91
Change-$0.16 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.48B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$87.81
Change-$0.15 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.91B
PNOYX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNOYX vs. RGAFX commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNOYX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. PNOYX (6.48B). PNOYX pays higher dividends than RGAFX: PNOYX (0.60) vs RGAFX (0.55). PNOYX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: PNOYX (31 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). PNOYX (0.62) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOYX (22.00). PNOYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: PNOYX (0) vs RGAFX (250). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.27 vs. PNOYX (-0.05). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.83 vs. PNOYX (27.68).
| PNOYX | RGAFX | PNOYX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.34 | 182% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.34 | 182% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.851 | 17.992 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.48B | 336B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.55 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.05 | 18.27 | -0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.67 | 61.26 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.68 | 50.83 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.15 | 104.93 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement