PNQI
Price
$47.89
Change
-$0.90 (-1.84%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
549.98M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XLK
Price
$196.25
Change
-$1.96 (-0.99%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
129.11B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PNQI vs XLK

Header iconPNQI vs XLK Comparison
Open Charts PNQI vs XLKBanner chart's image
PNQI vs XLK Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) vs. State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK)

Key Takeaways

  • PNQI provides targeted exposure to internet-focused companies across technology, consumer, and communication services, while XLK offers broad exposure to the U.S. technology sector through a market-cap-weighted approach.
  • PNQI maintains approximately 78 holdings with a higher expense ratio of 0.60%, compared to XLK’s roughly 75 holdings and lower expense ratio of 0.08%.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed and track established indexes with quarterly rebalancing for PNQI and annual reconstitution for XLK, resulting in concentrated top-10 positions exceeding 60% of assets in each fund.
  • PNQI emphasizes internet-centric themes such as e-commerce and online services, leading to greater sensitivity to consumer spending and digital adoption trends, whereas XLK focuses on hardware, software, and semiconductors.
  • XLK delivers broader diversification within technology with lower costs, while PNQI offers thematic concentration that may appeal to investors seeking pure-play internet exposure.
  • Structural differences position PNQI as a higher-cost, niche thematic vehicle and XLK as a cost-efficient, sector-wide benchmark.

Introduction

Investors comparing internet-themed and broad technology exposure often evaluate PNQI and XLK to align portfolios with digital economy growth. These ETFs do not compete directly; instead, they provide complementary yet distinct strategies within the technology and consumer sectors. PNQI targets companies deriving significant revenue from internet activities, while XLK captures the full spectrum of U.S. technology leaders. The comparison helps investors understand trade-offs in cost, concentration, and thematic purity amid ongoing digital transformation and sector rotation.

Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) Overview

PNQI is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that tracks the Nasdaq CTA Internet Index. The fund typically holds around 78 securities and seeks to invest at least 90% of assets in index components. Top holdings often include Amazon.com Inc., Alphabet Inc., and Meta Platforms Inc., with the top 10 positions accounting for over 60% of assets. Sector allocations emphasize technology services, retail trade, and consumer services. The expense ratio stands at 0.60%. The index applies modified market-capitalization weighting with caps on individual securities and undergoes quarterly rebalancing and reconstitution. PNQI is structured as an open-end fund listed on Nasdaq, providing thematic exposure to internet-related businesses.

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) Overview

XLK is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Index. The fund typically holds approximately 75 securities and invests substantially all assets in index components. Top holdings frequently feature NVIDIA Corp., Apple Inc., and Microsoft Corp., with the top 10 positions representing over 60% of assets. Nearly all exposure resides in the technology sector, with minor allocations to communication services. The expense ratio is 0.08%. The index uses a modified market-capitalization weighting methodology and is reconstituted annually with quarterly rebalancing. XLK operates as an open-end fund listed on NYSE Arca, serving as a core vehicle for broad U.S. technology sector exposure.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector continues to benefit from artificial intelligence adoption, cloud computing expansion, and semiconductor demand. Capital flows into digital infrastructure support both internet platforms and hardware providers. Regulatory scrutiny around data privacy and antitrust remains a factor for large technology firms. Macroeconomic drivers include interest rate expectations and corporate capital expenditure cycles. Sector risks encompass valuation compression, supply chain disruptions, and shifts in consumer spending patterns. These elements create an environment where thematic internet exposure and broad technology benchmarks respond differently to earnings cycles and innovation waves.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, XLK has delivered broad technology participation with relatively lower volatility due to its diversified holdings across hardware, software, and services. PNQI has shown sensitivity to internet-specific trends such as e-commerce growth and online advertising, leading to distinct relative performance during periods of consumer strength or digital advertising recovery. Both ETFs have participated in sector momentum driven by earnings of leading holdings, though PNQI’s narrower focus can amplify moves tied to retail and services spending. Interest rate environments and growth expectations influence positioning, with XLK often viewed as a core technology allocation and PNQI as a satellite thematic holding.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine your ETF research.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI would likely favor XLK in the current environment due to its lower expense ratio, broader diversification within technology, and strong alignment with prevailing sector momentum in semiconductors and software. The structural cost efficiency and established benchmark status provide a more consistent risk-adjusted profile compared to PNQI’s higher-cost thematic concentration. Investors seeking core technology exposure may find XLK’s positioning more compelling on a probabilistic basis.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
PNQI vs. XLK commentary
Jun 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNQI is a Hold and XLK is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLK has more net assets: 129B vs. PNQI (550M). XLK has a higher annual dividend yield than PNQI: XLK (36.468) vs PNQI (-11.198). PNQI was incepted earlier than XLK: PNQI (18 years) vs XLK (27 years). XLK (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than PNQI (0.60). PNQI has a higher turnover XLK (5.00) vs XLK (5.00).
PNQIXLKPNQI / XLK
Gain YTD-11.19836.468-31%
Net Assets550M129B0%
Total Expense Ratio0.600.08750%
Turnover15.005.00300%
Yield0.020.405%
Fund Existence18 years27 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PNQIXLK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PNQI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XLK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GRPZ29.58N/A
N/A
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 GARP ETF
HYGH86.27-0.08
-0.09%
iShares Interest Rate Hdg Hi Yld Bd ETF
TCPB50.60-0.13
-0.25%
Thrivent Core Plus Bond ETF
MCHI55.98-1.21
-2.12%
iShares MSCI China ETF
KARS35.50-1.22
-3.32%
KraneShares Eltc Vhl and Ft Mbly ETF

PNQI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNQI has been closely correlated with SHOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PNQI jumps, then SHOP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNQI
1D Price
Change %
PNQI100%
-1.82%
SHOP - PNQI
71%
Closely correlated
-3.48%
AMZN - PNQI
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.53%
ROKU - PNQI
65%
Loosely correlated
-3.87%
DASH - PNQI
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.51%
ABNB - PNQI
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
More

XLK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLK has been closely correlated with NOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 97% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLK jumps, then NOW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XLK
1D Price
Change %
XLK100%
-1.00%
NOW - XLK
97%
Closely correlated
-7.64%
QRVO - XLK
69%
Closely correlated
+1.94%
MA - XLK
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
V - XLK
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.55%
BR - XLK
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.45%
More