Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
POGRX vs RGAHX
POGRX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts POGRX vs RGAHX
POGRX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
POGRX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is POGRX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. POGRX (6.08B). POGRX (0.40) and RGAHX (0.40) have matching dividends . POGRX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: POGRX (22 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). POGRX (0.66) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. POGRX (11.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than POGRX: RGAHX (250) vs POGRX (2000). POGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.04 vs. RGAHX (0.18). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.78 vs. POGRX (-7.06).
| POGRX | RGAHX | POGRX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.44 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.44 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.372 | 9.200 | 254% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.08B | 353B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 0.40 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.04 | 0.18 | 5,591% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.37 | 43.47 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.06 | 13.78 | -51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.25 | 106.68 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement