Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
POGRX vs RGAHX
POGRX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts POGRX vs RGAHX
POGRX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
POGRX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is POGRX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. POGRX (6.33B). RGAHX (0.40) and POGRX (0.38) have matching dividends . POGRX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: POGRX (22 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). POGRX (0.66) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. POGRX (11.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than POGRX: RGAHX (250) vs POGRX (2000). POGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.50 vs. RGAHX (4.43). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 16.49 vs. POGRX (-2.72).
| POGRX | RGAHX | POGRX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.44 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.44 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.404 | 7.244 | 378% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.33B | 357B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 0.40 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.50 | 4.43 | 553% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.61 | 39.88 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.72 | 16.49 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.14 | 102.84 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement