Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
POLEX vs RNWFX
POLEX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts POLEX vs RNWFX
POLEX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. POLEX (229M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than POLEX: RNWFX (1.20) vs POLEX (0.61). POLEX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: POLEX (5 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). POLEX (1.31) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). POLEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than POLEX: RNWFX (250) vs POLEX (5000). POLEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.04 vs. RNWFX (31.39). POLEX return over 5 years is better than : 26.96 vs. RNWFX (20.98).
| POLEX | RNWFX | POLEX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.62 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.62 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.067 | 18.794 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 229M | 90.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 1.20 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 56.04 | 31.39 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 81.27 | 58.06 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.96 | 20.98 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 135.60 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement