Advertisement
PONY vs SHAZ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PONY is a Hold and SHAZ is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PONY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSHAZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- PONY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SHAZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PONY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHAZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PONY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
- SHAZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
PONY (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -5.53% price change this week, while SHAZ (@Information Technology Services) price change was +30.91% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -4.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +65.15%.
Reported Earning Dates
PONY is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2026.
SHAZ is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Information Technology Services (-4.74% weekly)The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
| PONY | SHAZ | PONY / SHAZ | |
| Capitalization | 3.54B | 1.54B | 230% |
| EBITDA | -263.15M | -39.39M | 668% |
| Gain YTD | -45.793 | 4737.369 | -1% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 110M | 1.54M | 7,161% |
| Total Cash | 1.07B | 173M | 617% |
| Total Debt | 16.4M | 204M | 8% |
| PONY | SHAZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 21% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 20% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 26% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 41% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 41% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 41% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | 16 days ago 33% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 9% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 42% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DUST | 55.45 | 1.41 | +2.61% |
| Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X ETF | |||
| LDRC | 25.13 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
| iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF | |||
| BUCK | 23.50 | -0.02 | -0.09% |
| Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | |||
| CORB | 29.42 | -0.07 | -0.24% |
| AB Core Bond ETF | |||
| GPIX | 55.36 | -0.14 | -0.25% |
| Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Inc ETF | |||
PONY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PONY has been loosely correlated with BBAI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PONY jumps, then BBAI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PONY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PONY | 100% | -5.76% | ||
| BBAI - PONY | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.30% | ||
| CIFR - PONY | 48% Loosely correlated | -3.56% | ||
| KEEL - PONY | 46% Loosely correlated | +5.88% | ||
| APLD - PONY | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.98% | ||
| AUR - PONY | 41% Loosely correlated | +4.62% | ||
More | ||||
SHAZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SHAZ and CYCU have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHAZ and CYCU's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHAZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHAZ | 100% | -0.85% | ||
| CYCU - SHAZ | 2% Poorly correlated | +2.83% | ||
| SAIH - SHAZ | 2% Poorly correlated | -4.00% | ||
| INGM - SHAZ | 0% Poorly correlated | +0.04% | ||
| TDTH - SHAZ | -0% Poorly correlated | -9.86% | ||
| PONY - SHAZ | -2% Poorly correlated | -5.76% | ||
More | ||||