PORT
Price
$11.99
Change
-$15.11 (-55.76%)
Updated
Sep 10 closing price
Capitalization
69.4M
VMCAF
Price
$12.40
Change
+$0.21 (+1.72%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
91.39M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PORT vs VMCAF

Header iconPORT vs VMCAF Comparison
Open Charts PORT vs VMCAFBanner chart's image
Southport Acquisition
Price$11.99
Change-$15.11 (-55.76%)
Volume$145.21K
Capitalization69.4M
Valuence Merger Corp. I
Price$12.40
Change+$0.21 (+1.72%)
Volume$100
Capitalization91.39M
PORT vs VMCAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PORT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PORT vs. VMCAF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PORT is a Buy and VMCAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (PORT: $11.99 vs. VMCAF: $12.40)
Brand notoriety: PORT and VMCAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PORT: 373% vs. VMCAF: 100%
Market capitalization -- PORT: $69.4M vs. VMCAF: $91.39M
PORT [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $69.4M. VMCAF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $91.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $173.25M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PORT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVMCAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PORT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VMCAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, VMCAF is a better buy in the long-term than PORT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PORT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PORT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

PORT (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VMCAF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.34% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMCAF($91.4M) has a higher market cap than PORT($69.4M). PORT has higher P/E ratio than VMCAF: PORT (110.45) vs VMCAF (62.00). VMCAF (7.639) and PORT (7.630) have similar YTD gains . VMCAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -804.51K vs. PORT (-4.4M). PORT has more cash in the bank: 329K vs. VMCAF (92.7K). PORT has less debt than VMCAF: PORT (814K) vs VMCAF (2.56M). PORT (0) and VMCAF (0) have equivalent revenues.
PORTVMCAFPORT / VMCAF
Capitalization69.4M91.4M76%
EBITDA-4.4M-804.51K547%
Gain YTD7.6307.639100%
P/E Ratio110.4562.00178%
Revenue00-
Total Cash329K92.7K355%
Total Debt814K2.56M32%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PORTVMCAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
3%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
16%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
27%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
22%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
35%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PORT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL256.874.56
+1.81%
Apple
SPY658.05-3.05
-0.46%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
GME25.27-0.98
-3.73%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X109049.290000-4279.343800
-3.78%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA423.39-19.40
-4.38%
Tesla

VMCAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VMCAF has been loosely correlated with PORT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VMCAF jumps, then PORT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VMCAF
1D Price
Change %
VMCAF100%
N/A
PORT - VMCAF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CSLMF - VMCAF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KVACU - VMCAF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRTLF - VMCAF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGMCU - VMCAF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
More