PPA
Price
$182.63
Change
-$1.83 (-0.99%)
Updated
Aug 13, 12:23 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
8.74B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SHLD
Price
$69.91
Change
-$0.24 (-0.34%)
Updated
Aug 13, 12:26 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
7.66B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PPA vs SHLD

PPA vs SHLD Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 07, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) vs. Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD)

Key Takeaways

  • Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) tracks the SPADE Defense Index with a focus on traditional aerospace and defense contractors, while Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) follows the Global X Defense Tech Index with greater emphasis on defense-related technology including artificial intelligence (AI) and cybersecurity.
  • PPA maintains approximately 60-64 holdings and carries a net expense ratio of 0.58%, compared to SHLD’s roughly 50-54 holdings and lower 0.50% expense ratio.
  • Both ETFs provide passive exposure to the defense sector but differ in thematic tilt: PPA centers on established primes and hardware, whereas SHLD incorporates software and advanced tech components.
  • Top holdings overlap significantly in names such as RTX Corporation (RTX), Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT), and General Dynamics Corporation (GD), yet SHLD adds differentiated exposure through holdings like Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR).
  • Structural characteristics position PPA as a more concentrated traditional defense vehicle and SHLD as a lower-cost option with broader tech integration within the same overarching sector.
  • Investors comparing the two should weigh PPA’s longer track record since 2005 against SHLD’s more recent inception in 2023 and its explicit defense technology mandate.

Introduction

Defense spending trends and geopolitical developments have elevated interest in sector-specific exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) both target companies benefiting from military and national security priorities yet pursue distinct strategies within the industrials space. They do not compete directly as identical products; instead, they offer investors complementary or alternative avenues for defense exposure, with PPA emphasizing established aerospace platforms and SHLD highlighting technology-driven solutions. This comparison helps clarify structural distinctions and positioning for investors evaluating thematic allocations in the current environment.

Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) Overview

Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the performance of the SPADE Defense Index, a modified market-capitalization-weighted benchmark of companies involved in aerospace, defense, and related government services. The ETF holds approximately 60-64 securities and maintains a net expense ratio of 0.58%. Its top holdings typically include RTX Corporation (RTX), Boeing Co (BA), GE Aerospace (GE), Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT), and General Dynamics Corporation (GD), with the top 10 positions accounting for roughly half of assets. Sector allocation centers overwhelmingly on industrials, reflecting traditional defense contractors and aerospace manufacturers. The fund employs a rules-based, market-cap approach with periodic rebalancing and offers established liquidity as one of the longer-running defense-themed ETFs, launched in 2005.

Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) Overview

Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) is a passively managed fund designed to track the Global X Defense Tech Index, which selects companies positioned to benefit from defense technology adoption, including AI, cybersecurity, robotics, and advanced hardware systems. The ETF holds approximately 50-54 securities and features a net expense ratio of 0.50%. Top holdings generally feature RTX Corporation (RTX), General Dynamics Corporation (GD), Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT), Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC), and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR), with notable inclusion of technology-oriented names alongside traditional defense firms. Sector exposure remains concentrated in industrials but incorporates meaningful allocations to information technology through its defense-tech mandate. Launched in September 2023, the fund uses a modified market-cap weighting methodology and periodic rebalancing to maintain its thematic focus.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The defense sector operates amid sustained government budget allocations driven by geopolitical tensions, modernization programs, and inventory replenishment needs. Both ETFs benefit from multi-year spending trajectories that prioritize advanced platforms, cybersecurity enhancements, and emerging technologies such as AI-enabled systems. Regulatory support for domestic suppliers and export controls further shape capital flows toward established contractors and innovative technology providers. Macroeconomic factors, including interest rate trajectories and fiscal priorities, influence procurement cycles, while supply-chain constraints and talent shortages in specialized engineering represent ongoing sector risks. Capital continues to flow into the space as nations address capability gaps across hardware, software, and integrated defense solutions.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have reflected broader defense-sector momentum tied to earnings strength at major contractors and policy-driven demand. PPA’s heavier weighting toward traditional aerospace names has aligned its movements closely with hardware delivery schedules and long-term contract awards. SHLD’s inclusion of technology components has introduced additional sensitivity to software adoption trends and AI-related developments within defense applications. Relative positioning shows PPA offering more established diversification across legacy platforms, while SHLD provides differentiated exposure that may exhibit varied volatility during periods of tech-sector rotation. Over broader timeframes, performance differentials stem primarily from the distinct index constructions rather than short-term price fluctuations.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to discover additional opportunities aligned with your investment criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including a lower expense ratio, a technology-forward index mandate, and balanced exposure across traditional and emerging defense segments, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorability to Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) for investors seeking efficient access to evolving defense themes. PPA remains a strong alternative for those prioritizing a longer-established vehicle with concentrated exposure to core aerospace contractors. Selection ultimately depends on individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio objectives.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
PPA vs. SHLD commentary
Aug 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PPA is a StrongBuy and SHLD is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PPA has more net assets: 8.74B vs. SHLD (7.66B). PPA has a higher annual dividend yield than SHLD: PPA (17.891) vs SHLD (8.620). PPA was incepted earlier than SHLD: PPA (21 years) vs SHLD (3 years). SHLD (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than PPA (0.58). SHLD has a higher turnover PPA (14.00) vs PPA (14.00).
PPASHLDPPA / SHLD
Gain YTD17.8918.620208%
Net Assets8.74B7.66B114%
Total Expense Ratio0.580.50116%
Turnover14.0032.7943%
Yield0.370.6755%
Fund Existence21 years3 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PPASHLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PPA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SHLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CARD2.340.06
+2.41%
Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Lvrgd ETN
GXPT33.990.39
+1.16%
Global X PureCap MSCI Infor Tech ETF
ETY14.73N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund
FINS12.65-0.02
-0.16%
Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term Trust
BDCX20.88-0.15
-0.73%
ETRACS Qrtly Py 1.5X Lvgd Wls Fg BDC ETN

PPA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PPA has been closely correlated with CW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PPA jumps, then CW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PPA
1D Price
Change %
PPA100%
+0.21%
CW - PPA
74%
Closely correlated
+2.51%
BWXT - PPA
73%
Closely correlated
+1.68%
GE - PPA
70%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
RTX - PPA
69%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
HWM - PPA
69%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
More

SHLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHLD has been loosely correlated with LHX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHLD jumps, then LHX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHLD
1D Price
Change %
SHLD100%
+1.01%
LHX - SHLD
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.65%
NOC - SHLD
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
GD - SHLD
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
BWXT - SHLD
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.68%
LMT - SHLD
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.50%
More