Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PPADX vs RMFCX
PPADX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PPADX vs RMFCX
PPADX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. PPADX (350M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PPADX: RMFCX (1.15) vs PPADX (0.42). PPADX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PPADX (4 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than PPADX (0.54). PPADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PPADX: RMFCX (250) vs PPADX (1000000). PPADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.82 vs. RMFCX (6.41).
| PPADX | RMFCX | PPADX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.91 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.91 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.814 | 8.402 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 350M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 1.15 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.82 | 6.41 | 231% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.13 | 35.52 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 35.44 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 93.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement