Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PPSFX vs RMEBX
PPSFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PPSFX vs RMEBX
PPSFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PPSFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PPSFX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. PPSFX (2.27B). RMEBX (1.04) and PPSFX (1.01) have matching dividends . PPSFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PPSFX (26 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). PPSFX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). PPSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.50 vs. RMEBX (30.00). PPSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: PPSFX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.14 vs. PPSFX (1.98). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.62 vs. PPSFX (2.28).
| PPSFX | RMEBX | PPSFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.07 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.07 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.777 | 6.444 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.27B | 117B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 1.04 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.98 | 10.14 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.14 | 34.54 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.28 | 35.62 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.12 | 94.57 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement