Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PPSFX vs RMEBX
PPSFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PPSFX vs RMEBX
PPSFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PPSFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PPSFX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. PPSFX (2.27B). PPSFX (1.00) and RMEBX (1.00) have matching dividends . PPSFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PPSFX (26 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). PPSFX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). PPSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.50 vs. RMEBX (30.00). PPSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: PPSFX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.88 vs. PPSFX (-0.50). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.24 vs. PPSFX (3.91).
| PPSFX | RMEBX | PPSFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.07 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.07 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.380 | 8.533 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.27B | 118B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 1.00 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.50 | 6.88 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.35 | 30.86 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.91 | 35.24 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.09 | 88.54 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement