Ad is loading...
PPSRX vs RMEBX
PPSRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PPSRX vs RMEBX
Principal Large Cap Value III R5
Price$18.81
Change+$0.14 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.49B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$55.41
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.91B
PPSRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PPSRX vs. RMEBX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PPSRX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. PPSRX (3.49B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than PPSRX: RMEBX (1.21) vs PPSRX (1.13). PPSRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PPSRX (24 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than PPSRX (0.96). PPSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.10 vs. RMEBX (31.00). PPSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: PPSRX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.19 vs. PPSRX (-3.03). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.02 vs. PPSRX (39.72).
| PPSRX | RMEBX | PPSRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.07 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.07 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.013 | 1.203 | -250% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.49B | 101B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.21 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.03 | 5.19 | -58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.49 | 16.77 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.72 | 55.02 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.60 | 58.89 | 50% |