Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PPSRX vs RMEBX
PPSRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PPSRX vs RMEBX
PPSRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PPSRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PPSRX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. PPSRX (2.31B). PPSRX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: PPSRX (1.26) vs RMEBX (0.99). PPSRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PPSRX (26 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than PPSRX (0.96). PPSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.50 vs. RMEBX (30.00). PPSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: PPSRX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.96 vs. PPSRX (2.82). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.13 vs. PPSRX (4.80).
| PPSRX | RMEBX | PPSRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.07 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.07 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.105 | 9.416 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.31B | 118B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.99 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.82 | 8.96 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.37 | 32.63 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.80 | 36.13 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.44 | 90.64 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers