Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PQIAX vs RMEBX
PQIAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PQIAX vs RMEBX
PQIAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PQIAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PQIAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. PQIAX (7.95B). PQIAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: PQIAX (1.17) vs RMEBX (0.99). PQIAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PQIAX (87 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than PQIAX (0.85). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. PQIAX (16.70). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PQIAX: RMEBX (250) vs PQIAX (1000). PQIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.33 vs. RMEBX (8.96). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.13 vs. PQIAX (19.50).
| PQIAX | RMEBX | PQIAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.07 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.07 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 87 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.458 | 9.416 | 132% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.95B | 118B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.99 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.33 | 8.96 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.94 | 32.63 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.50 | 36.13 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.95 | 90.64 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers