Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PQIAX vs RMEBX
PQIAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PQIAX vs RMEBX
PQIAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PQIAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PQIAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. PQIAX (7.97B). PQIAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: PQIAX (1.17) vs RMEBX (1.04). PQIAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PQIAX (87 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than PQIAX (0.85). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. PQIAX (16.70). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PQIAX: RMEBX (250) vs PQIAX (1000). PQIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.73 vs. RMEBX (10.14). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.62 vs. PQIAX (19.59).
| PQIAX | RMEBX | PQIAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.07 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.07 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 87 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.600 | 6.444 | 149% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.97B | 117B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 1.04 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.73 | 10.14 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.44 | 34.54 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.59 | 35.62 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.60 | 94.57 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement