PR
Price
$15.18
Change
+$0.05 (+0.33%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
96 days until earnings call
SM
Price
$44.27
Change
+$0.55 (+1.26%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
96 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

PR vs SM

Header iconPR vs SM Comparison
Open Charts PR vs SMBanner chart's image
Permian Resources
Price$15.18
Change+$0.05 (+0.33%)
Volume$5.71M
CapitalizationN/A
SM Energy
Price$44.27
Change+$0.55 (+1.26%)
Volume$1.15M
CapitalizationN/A
PR vs SM Comparison Chart
Loading...
PR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PR vs. SM commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PR is a Buy and SM is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (PR: $15.18 vs. SM: $44.27)
Brand notoriety: PR and SM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PR: 53% vs. SM: 65%
Market capitalization -- PR: $10.28B vs. SM: $5.77B
PR [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $10.28B. SM’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $5.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SM is a better buy in the long-term than PR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SM is a better buy in the short-term than PR.

Price Growth

PR (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +2.42% price change this week, while SM (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +2.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

PR is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

SM is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-0.21% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PR($10.3B) has a higher market cap than SM($5.77B). PR has higher P/E ratio than SM: PR (14.29) vs SM (7.37). PR (16.856) and SM (16.320) have similar YTD gains . PR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.2B vs. SM (1.7B). SM has more cash in the bank: 616M vs. PR (73.3M). SM has less debt than PR: SM (1.58B) vs PR (3.91B). PR has higher revenues than SM: PR (3.12B) vs SM (2.36B).
PRSMPR / SM
Capitalization10.3B5.77B179%
EBITDA2.2B1.7B130%
Gain YTD16.85616.320103%
P/E Ratio14.297.37194%
Revenue3.12B2.36B132%
Total Cash73.3M616M12%
Total Debt3.91B1.58B248%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PR vs SM: Fundamental Ratings
PR
SM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1514
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
924
SMR RATING
1..100
9542
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5158
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9252
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a45

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PR's Valuation (45) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as SM (48). This means that PR’s stock grew similarly to SM’s over the last 12 months.

PR's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as SM (24). This means that PR’s stock grew similarly to SM’s over the last 12 months.

SM's SMR Rating (42) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PR (95). This means that SM’s stock grew somewhat faster than PR’s over the last 12 months.

PR's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as SM (58). This means that PR’s stock grew similarly to SM’s over the last 12 months.

SM's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PR (92). This means that SM’s stock grew somewhat faster than PR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PRSM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IPKW40.840.12
+0.30%
Invesco Intl BuyBack Achiev™ ETF
HCRB34.880.03
+0.07%
Hartford Core Bond ETF
OVLH34.69N/A
N/A
Overlay Shares Hedged Lrg Cp Eq ETF
QVML35.09-0.18
-0.51%
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF
VBK284.98-4.23
-1.46%
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF

PR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PR has been closely correlated with MTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PR jumps, then MTDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PR
1D Price
Change %
PR100%
+1.34%
MTDR - PR
86%
Closely correlated
+1.72%
OVV - PR
84%
Closely correlated
+5.95%
MGY - PR
83%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
CIVI - PR
82%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
NOG - PR
79%
Closely correlated
+0.79%
More

SM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SM has been closely correlated with MTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SM jumps, then MTDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SM
1D Price
Change %
SM100%
+1.26%
MTDR - SM
83%
Closely correlated
+1.72%
NOG - SM
81%
Closely correlated
+0.79%
CIVI - SM
80%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
OVV - SM
80%
Closely correlated
+5.95%
PR - SM
79%
Closely correlated
+1.34%
More