PR
Price
$14.36
Change
-$0.23 (-1.58%)
Updated
Dec 2, 04:40 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.87B
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SM
Price
$19.55
Change
-$0.15 (-0.76%)
Updated
Dec 2, 04:43 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.26B
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PR vs SM

Header iconPR vs SM Comparison
Open Charts PR vs SMBanner chart's image
Permian Resources
Price$14.36
Change-$0.23 (-1.58%)
Volume$38.93K
Capitalization10.87B
SM Energy
Price$19.55
Change-$0.15 (-0.76%)
Volume$2.07K
Capitalization2.26B
PR vs SM Comparison Chart in %
PR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PR vs. SM commentary
Dec 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PR is a StrongBuy and SM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 02, 2025
Stock price -- (PR: $14.59 vs. SM: $19.70)
Brand notoriety: PR and SM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PR: 84% vs. SM: 77%
Market capitalization -- PR: $10.87B vs. SM: $2.26B
PR [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $10.87B. SM’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $2.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $111.54B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PR is a better buy in the long-term than SM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PR is a better buy in the short-term than SM.

Price Growth

PR (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +4.36% price change this week, while SM (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +6.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

PR is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

SM is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+1.49% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PR($10.9B) has a higher market cap than SM($2.26B). PR has higher P/E ratio than SM: PR (13.03) vs SM (3.11). PR YTD gains are higher at: 4.818 vs. SM (-47.594). PR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.89B vs. SM (2.23B). SM has less debt than PR: SM (2.71B) vs PR (4.15B). PR has higher revenues than SM: PR (5.09B) vs SM (3.1B).
PRSMPR / SM
Capitalization10.9B2.26B483%
EBITDA3.89B2.23B174%
Gain YTD4.818-47.594-10%
P/E Ratio13.033.11419%
Revenue5.09B3.1B164%
Total Cash138KN/A-
Total Debt4.15B2.71B153%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PR vs SM: Fundamental Ratings
PR
SM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3012
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2164
SMR RATING
1..100
5945
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4685
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1293
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SM's Valuation (21) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is significantly better than the same rating for PR (93). This means that SM’s stock grew significantly faster than PR’s over the last 12 months.

PR's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SM (64). This means that PR’s stock grew somewhat faster than SM’s over the last 12 months.

SM's SMR Rating (45) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as PR (59). This means that SM’s stock grew similarly to PR’s over the last 12 months.

PR's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SM (85). This means that PR’s stock grew somewhat faster than SM’s over the last 12 months.

PR's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is significantly better than the same rating for SM (93). This means that PR’s stock grew significantly faster than SM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PRSM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DEEF35.180.04
+0.12%
Xtrackers FTSE Develop ex US Mulfact ETF
ROPE26.52N/A
N/A
Coastal Compass 100 ETF
ADME51.52-0.26
-0.50%
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
IYRI49.38-0.64
-1.27%
NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF
ARKF48.42-1.16
-2.34%
ARK Blockchain & Fintech Innovation ETF

PR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PR has been closely correlated with OVV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PR jumps, then OVV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PR
1D Price
Change %
PR100%
+0.69%
OVV - PR
91%
Closely correlated
+1.51%
MTDR - PR
90%
Closely correlated
+2.62%
CHRD - PR
89%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
FANG - PR
88%
Closely correlated
+2.34%
DVN - PR
87%
Closely correlated
+2.16%
More

SM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SM has been closely correlated with NOG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SM jumps, then NOG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SM
1D Price
Change %
SM100%
+3.41%
NOG - SM
89%
Closely correlated
+3.08%
MTDR - SM
89%
Closely correlated
+2.62%
CHRD - SM
88%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
PR - SM
87%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
OVV - SM
87%
Closely correlated
+1.51%
More