Ad is loading...
PR
Price
$14.80
Change
-$0.38 (-2.50%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
94 days until earnings call
VTS
Price
$27.03
Change
-$0.32 (-1.17%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

PR vs VTS

Header iconPR vs VTS Comparison
Open Charts PR vs VTSBanner chart's image
Permian Resources
Price$14.80
Change-$0.38 (-2.50%)
Volume$6.61M
CapitalizationN/A
Vitesse Energy
Price$27.03
Change-$0.32 (-1.17%)
Volume$134.67K
CapitalizationN/A
PR vs VTS Comparison Chart
Loading...
PR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PR vs. VTS commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PR is a Sell and VTS is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (PR: $14.80 vs. VTS: $27.03)
Brand notoriety: PR and VTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PR: 63% vs. VTS: 75%
Market capitalization -- PR: $10.28B vs. VTS: $698.94M
PR [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $10.28B. VTS’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $698.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVTS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VTS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PR and VTS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VTS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VTS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VTS is a better buy in the short-term than PR.

Price Growth

PR (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +0.19% price change this week, while VTS (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -0.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

PR is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

VTS is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-0.30% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PR($10.3B) has a higher market cap than VTS($699M). PR has higher P/E ratio than VTS: PR (14.29) vs VTS (7.35). VTS YTD gains are higher at: 31.740 vs. PR (13.931). PR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.2B vs. VTS (129M). PR has more cash in the bank: 73.3M vs. VTS (552K). VTS has less debt than PR: VTS (84.3M) vs PR (3.91B). PR has higher revenues than VTS: PR (3.12B) vs VTS (234M).
PRVTSPR / VTS
Capitalization10.3B699M1,474%
EBITDA2.2B129M1,709%
Gain YTD13.93131.74044%
P/E Ratio14.297.35194%
Revenue3.12B234M1,334%
Total Cash73.3M552K13,279%
Total Debt3.91B84.3M4,638%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PR: Fundamental Ratings
PR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
22
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
92
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PRVTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBTK19.290.04
+0.18%
iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Trsry ETF
IXUS67.70-0.18
-0.27%
iShares Core MSCI Total Intl Stk ETF
FQAL65.72-1.11
-1.66%
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
WFH62.32-1.41
-2.21%
Direxion Work From Home ETF
IWLG47.13-1.07
-2.23%
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF

PR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PR has been closely correlated with MTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PR jumps, then MTDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PR
1D Price
Change %
PR100%
-2.50%
MTDR - PR
86%
Closely correlated
-2.06%
OVV - PR
84%
Closely correlated
-2.08%
MGY - PR
83%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
CIVI - PR
82%
Closely correlated
-0.93%
NOG - PR
79%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
More

VTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VTS has been closely correlated with CIVI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VTS jumps, then CIVI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VTS
1D Price
Change %
VTS100%
-1.17%
CIVI - VTS
71%
Closely correlated
-0.93%
MTDR - VTS
68%
Closely correlated
-2.06%
NOG - VTS
68%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
PR - VTS
67%
Closely correlated
-2.50%
CHRD - VTS
67%
Closely correlated
-2.76%
More