PR
Price
$13.24
Change
-$0.46 (-3.36%)
Updated
Sep 15 closing price
Capitalization
9.3B
56 days until earnings call
VTS
Price
$24.12
Change
-$0.96 (-3.83%)
Updated
Sep 15 closing price
Capitalization
931.36M
43 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PR vs VTS

Header iconPR vs VTS Comparison
Open Charts PR vs VTSBanner chart's image
Permian Resources
Price$13.24
Change-$0.46 (-3.36%)
Volume$41.23M
Capitalization9.3B
Vitesse Energy
Price$24.12
Change-$0.96 (-3.83%)
Volume$631.28K
Capitalization931.36M
PR vs VTS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PR vs. VTS commentary
Sep 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PR is a Buy and VTS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 16, 2025
Stock price -- (PR: $13.24 vs. VTS: $24.12)
Brand notoriety: PR and VTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PR: 383% vs. VTS: 195%
Market capitalization -- PR: $9.3B vs. VTS: $931.36M
PR [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $9.3B. VTS’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $931.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $115.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • VTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PR is a better buy in the long-term than VTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VTS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VTS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PR is a better buy in the short-term than VTS.

Price Growth

PR (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -3.99% price change this week, while VTS (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -3.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

PR is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

VTS is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+1.43% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PR($9.3B) has a higher market cap than VTS($931M). VTS has higher P/E ratio than PR: VTS (22.13) vs PR (8.49). VTS YTD gains are higher at: 3.452 vs. PR (-5.958). PR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.89B vs. VTS (177M). PR has more cash in the bank: 451M vs. VTS (1.96M). VTS has less debt than PR: VTS (112M) vs PR (4.15B). PR has higher revenues than VTS: PR (5.09B) vs VTS (262M).
PRVTSPR / VTS
Capitalization9.3B931M999%
EBITDA3.89B177M2,198%
Gain YTD-5.9583.452-173%
P/E Ratio8.4922.1338%
Revenue5.09B262M1,941%
Total Cash451M1.96M22,987%
Total Debt4.15B112M3,703%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PR: Fundamental Ratings
PR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
55
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
25
SMR RATING
1..100
61
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
71
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PRVTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABALX38.650.04
+0.10%
American Funds American Balanced A
GILLX24.68N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity Inst
KLCIX21.21N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap IS
SAGYX152.84N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Growth I
LVAVX14.88N/A
N/A
LSV Conservative Value Equity Investor

VTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VTS has been closely correlated with CRGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VTS jumps, then CRGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VTS
1D Price
Change %
VTS100%
-1.62%
CRGY - VTS
76%
Closely correlated
-2.88%
CHRD - VTS
74%
Closely correlated
-1.78%
NOG - VTS
74%
Closely correlated
-1.89%
OVV - VTS
73%
Closely correlated
-2.14%
PR - VTS
73%
Closely correlated
-3.36%
More