PRBZF
Price
$70.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 1 closing price
SGLJF
Price
$17.60
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 12 closing price
Ad is loading...

PRBZF vs SGLJF

Header iconPRBZF vs SGLJF Comparison
Open Charts PRBZF vs SGLJFBanner chart's image
Premium Brands Holding
Price$70.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.82K
CapitalizationN/A
Strauss Group
Price$17.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
PRBZF vs SGLJF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
PRBZF vs. SGLJF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRBZF is a Hold and SGLJF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (PRBZF: $67.52 vs. SGLJF: $15.04)
Brand notoriety: PRBZF and SGLJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PRBZF: 76% vs. SGLJF: 334%
Market capitalization -- PRBZF: $2.98B vs. SGLJF: $2.09B
PRBZF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $2.98B. SGLJF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $2.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PRBZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSGLJF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PRBZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SGLJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PRBZF and SGLJF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

PRBZF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SGLJF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.11%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.46% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRBZF($2.98B) has a higher market cap than SGLJF($2.09B). PRBZF has higher P/E ratio than SGLJF: PRBZF (37.77) vs SGLJF (20.16). PRBZF YTD gains are higher at: -3.517 vs. SGLJF (-37.979). SGLJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.18B vs. PRBZF (447M). SGLJF has more cash in the bank: 517M vs. PRBZF (13.8M). PRBZF has less debt than SGLJF: PRBZF (2.39B) vs SGLJF (2.63B). SGLJF has higher revenues than PRBZF: SGLJF (6.8B) vs PRBZF (5.46B).
PRBZFSGLJFPRBZF / SGLJF
Capitalization2.98B2.09B143%
EBITDA447M1.18B38%
Gain YTD-3.517-37.9799%
P/E Ratio37.7720.16187%
Revenue5.46B6.8B80%
Total Cash13.8M517M3%
Total Debt2.39B2.63B91%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PRBZF vs SGLJF: Fundamental Ratings
PRBZF
SGLJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9594
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8066
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5184
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7288
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PRBZF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is in the same range as SGLJF (21). This means that PRBZF’s stock grew similarly to SGLJF’s over the last 12 months.

PRBZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SGLJF (100). This means that PRBZF’s stock grew similarly to SGLJF’s over the last 12 months.

SGLJF's SMR Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as PRBZF (80). This means that SGLJF’s stock grew similarly to PRBZF’s over the last 12 months.

PRBZF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGLJF (84). This means that PRBZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGLJF’s over the last 12 months.

PRBZF's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as SGLJF (88). This means that PRBZF’s stock grew similarly to SGLJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

PRBZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PRBZF and OCGPF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PRBZF and OCGPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRBZF
1D Price
Change %
PRBZF100%
N/A
OCGPF - PRBZF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AJOY - PRBZF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRPT - PRBZF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.95%
SAPIF - PRBZF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSGUF - PRBZF
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
More

SGLJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SGLJF and KIKOF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SGLJF and KIKOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGLJF
1D Price
Change %
SGLJF100%
N/A
KIKOF - SGLJF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLFNF - SGLJF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
SUEZY - SGLJF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRBZF - SGLJF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PIFMY - SGLJF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More