PREIF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
12.58M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RGRNF
Price
$4.48
Change
+$0.19 (+4.43%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
3.37B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PREIF vs RGRNF

Header iconPREIF vs RGRNF Comparison
Open Charts PREIF vs RGRNFBanner chart's image
Precipitate Gold
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$14K
Capitalization12.58M
Regis Resources NL
Price$4.48
Change+$0.19 (+4.43%)
Volume$100
Capitalization3.37B
PREIF vs RGRNF Comparison Chart in %
PREIF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RGRNF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PREIF vs. RGRNF commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PREIF is a Hold and RGRNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (PREIF: $0.09 vs. RGRNF: $4.48)
Brand notoriety: PREIF and RGRNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PREIF: 14% vs. RGRNF: 3%
Market capitalization -- PREIF: $12.58M vs. RGRNF: $3.37B
PREIF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $12.58M. RGRNF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $109.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PREIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRGRNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PREIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RGRNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RGRNF is a better buy in the long-term than PREIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PREIF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGRNF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PREIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RGRNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RGRNF is a better buy in the short-term than PREIF.

Price Growth

PREIF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +0.08% price change this week, while RGRNF (@Precious Metals) price change was +4.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +68.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-0.08% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGRNF($3.37B) has a higher market cap than PREIF($12.6M). RGRNF YTD gains are higher at: 191.857 vs. PREIF (105.358). RGRNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 784M vs. PREIF (-1.19M). RGRNF has more cash in the bank: 505M vs. PREIF (4.13M). RGRNF has higher revenues than PREIF: RGRNF (1.65B) vs PREIF (0).
PREIFRGRNFPREIF / RGRNF
Capitalization12.6M3.37B0%
EBITDA-1.19M784M-0%
Gain YTD105.358191.85755%
P/E RatioN/A20.66-
Revenue01.65B-
Total Cash4.13M505M1%
Total DebtN/A119M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PREIF vs RGRNF: Fundamental Ratings
PREIF
RGRNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8230
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10070
SMR RATING
1..100
9353
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3737
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
811
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RGRNF's Valuation (47) in the null industry is in the same range as PREIF (59). This means that RGRNF’s stock grew similarly to PREIF’s over the last 12 months.

RGRNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as PREIF (100). This means that RGRNF’s stock grew similarly to PREIF’s over the last 12 months.

RGRNF's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PREIF (93). This means that RGRNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PREIF’s over the last 12 months.

RGRNF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as PREIF (37). This means that RGRNF’s stock grew similarly to PREIF’s over the last 12 months.

PREIF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as RGRNF (11). This means that PREIF’s stock grew similarly to RGRNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PREIFRGRNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PREIF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RGRNF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APO127.202.88
+2.32%
Apollo Global Management
KMX34.200.76
+2.27%
CarMax
EVO2.990.03
+1.01%
Evotec SE
SLS1.53-0.06
-3.77%
SELLAS Life Sciences Group
CLGN2.06-0.09
-4.19%
CollPlant Biotechnologies Ltd

PREIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PREIF and EREPF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PREIF and EREPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PREIF
1D Price
Change %
PREIF100%
-0.72%
EREPF - PREIF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STBMF - PREIF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RCGCF - PREIF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.96%
RDEXF - PREIF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.69%
RGRNF - PREIF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RGRNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RGRNF and AUGG have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGRNF and AUGG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGRNF
1D Price
Change %
RGRNF100%
N/A
AUGG - RGRNF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PROBF - RGRNF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
RIOFF - RGRNF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PREIF - RGRNF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
RDUFF - RGRNF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-21.90%
More