PREIF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
8.53M
RGRNF
Price
$2.80
Change
+$0.12 (+4.48%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.23B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PREIF vs RGRNF

Header iconPREIF vs RGRNF Comparison
Open Charts PREIF vs RGRNFBanner chart's image
Precipitate Gold
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$176K
Capitalization8.53M
Regis Resources NL
Price$2.80
Change+$0.12 (+4.48%)
Volume$1.72K
Capitalization2.23B
PREIF vs RGRNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PREIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGRNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PREIF vs. RGRNF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PREIF is a Hold and RGRNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (PREIF: $0.06 vs. RGRNF: $2.80)
Brand notoriety: PREIF and RGRNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PREIF: 248% vs. RGRNF: 66%
Market capitalization -- PREIF: $8.53M vs. RGRNF: $2.23B
PREIF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $8.53M. RGRNF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $79.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PREIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRGRNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PREIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RGRNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RGRNF is a better buy in the long-term than PREIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PREIF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGRNF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PREIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RGRNF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both PREIF and RGRNF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

PREIF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -0.38% price change this week, while RGRNF (@Precious Metals) price change was +5.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5323.16%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.84% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGRNF($2.23B) has a higher market cap than PREIF($8.53M). RGRNF YTD gains are higher at: 82.150 vs. PREIF (47.560).
PREIFRGRNFPREIF / RGRNF
Capitalization8.53M2.23B0%
EBITDA-1.19MN/A-
Gain YTD47.56082.15058%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash4.13MN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PREIF vs RGRNF: Fundamental Ratings
PREIF
RGRNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9491
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6240
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
101
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PREIF's Valuation (58) in the null industry is in the same range as RGRNF (80). This means that PREIF’s stock grew similarly to RGRNF’s over the last 12 months.

PREIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RGRNF (100). This means that PREIF’s stock grew similarly to RGRNF’s over the last 12 months.

RGRNF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as PREIF (94). This means that RGRNF’s stock grew similarly to PREIF’s over the last 12 months.

RGRNF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as PREIF (62). This means that RGRNF’s stock grew similarly to PREIF’s over the last 12 months.

RGRNF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as PREIF (10). This means that RGRNF’s stock grew similarly to PREIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PREIFRGRNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PREIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGRNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZETA19.131.32
+7.41%
Zeta Global Holdings Corp
FAST48.880.19
+0.39%
Fastenal Co
HCAT2.92N/A
-0.17%
Health Catalyst
CRSR8.74-0.14
-1.58%
Corsair Gaming
HUIZ2.27-0.31
-11.87%
Huize Holding Limited

PREIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PREIF and EREPF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PREIF and EREPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PREIF
1D Price
Change %
PREIF100%
+0.93%
EREPF - PREIF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STBMF - PREIF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RCGCF - PREIF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RDEXF - PREIF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.69%
RGRNF - PREIF
2%
Poorly correlated
+4.33%
More

RGRNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RGRNF and AUGG have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGRNF and AUGG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGRNF
1D Price
Change %
RGRNF100%
+4.33%
AUGG - RGRNF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
PROBF - RGRNF
10%
Poorly correlated
+7.56%
RIOFF - RGRNF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.13%
PREIF - RGRNF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
RDUFF - RGRNF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More