PREIF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
5.76M
STBMF
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.03 (-14.29%)
Updated
Jul 7 closing price
Capitalization
93.29M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PREIF vs STBMF

Header iconPREIF vs STBMF Comparison
Open Charts PREIF vs STBMFBanner chart's image
Precipitate Gold
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$31K
Capitalization5.76M
St. Barbara
Price$0.18
Change-$0.03 (-14.29%)
Volume$100
Capitalization93.29M
PREIF vs STBMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PREIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PREIF vs. STBMF commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PREIF is a Hold and STBMF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (PREIF: $0.07 vs. STBMF: $0.18)
Brand notoriety: PREIF and STBMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PREIF: 30% vs. STBMF: 1%
Market capitalization -- PREIF: $5.76M vs. STBMF: $93.29M
PREIF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $5.76M. STBMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $93.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PREIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTBMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PREIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STBMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, STBMF is a better buy in the long-term than PREIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PREIF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STBMF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PREIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • STBMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STBMF is a better buy in the short-term than PREIF.

Price Growth

PREIF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +1.82% price change this week, while STBMF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.16% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STBMF($93.3M) has a higher market cap than PREIF($5.76M). STBMF YTD gains are higher at: 76.341 vs. PREIF (52.554). PREIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.14M vs. STBMF (-28.54M). STBMF has more cash in the bank: 294M vs. PREIF (5.55M). STBMF has higher revenues than PREIF: STBMF (110M) vs PREIF (0).
PREIFSTBMFPREIF / STBMF
Capitalization5.76M93.3M6%
EBITDA-2.14M-28.54M7%
Gain YTD52.55476.34169%
P/E Ratio7.99N/A-
Revenue0110M-
Total Cash5.55M294M2%
Total DebtN/A12.9M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PREIF vs STBMF: Fundamental Ratings
PREIF
STBMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5743
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9393
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5547
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1096
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STBMF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PREIF (55). This means that STBMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PREIF’s over the last 12 months.

STBMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PREIF (100). This means that STBMF’s stock grew similarly to PREIF’s over the last 12 months.

STBMF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as PREIF (93). This means that STBMF’s stock grew similarly to PREIF’s over the last 12 months.

STBMF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as PREIF (55). This means that STBMF’s stock grew similarly to PREIF’s over the last 12 months.

PREIF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for STBMF (96). This means that PREIF’s stock grew significantly faster than STBMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PREIFSTBMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PREIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TPG58.400.83
+1.44%
TPG
XYZ80.740.97
+1.22%
Block Inc
REX54.120.57
+1.06%
REX American Resources Corp
SLN6.340.06
+0.96%
Silence Therapeutics Plc
NNVC1.68-0.03
-1.75%
NanoViricides

PREIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PREIF and EREPF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PREIF and EREPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PREIF
1D Price
Change %
PREIF100%
N/A
EREPF - PREIF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STBMF - PREIF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RCGCF - PREIF
7%
Poorly correlated
-5.74%
RDEXF - PREIF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RGRNF - PREIF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

STBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STBMF has been loosely correlated with GLBKF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STBMF jumps, then GLBKF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STBMF
1D Price
Change %
STBMF100%
N/A
GLBKF - STBMF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GSISF - STBMF
30%
Poorly correlated
-4.09%
TDRRF - STBMF
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.64%
KSSRF - STBMF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELRRF - STBMF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.35%
More