Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRGFX vs RGAGX
PRGFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts PRGFX vs RGAGX
PRGFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRGFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRGFX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. PRGFX (48.7B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than PRGFX: RGAGX (0.51) vs PRGFX (0.00). PRGFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: PRGFX (76 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). PRGFX (0.66) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). PRGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.20 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRGFX: RGAGX (250) vs PRGFX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.49 vs. PRGFX (-7.54). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 15.00 vs. PRGFX (-6.44).
| PRGFX | RGAGX | PRGFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.29 | 228% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.29 | 228% |
| Fund Existence | 76 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.516 | 9.321 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.7B | 353B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.54 | 0.49 | -1,541% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.99 | 44.65 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.44 | 15.00 | -43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.62 | 110.30 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement