Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRGSX vs RNPEX
PRGSX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts PRGSX vs RNPEX
PRGSX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRGSX vs. RNPEX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRGSX is a Hold and RNPEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. PRGSX (9.02B). RNPEX pays higher dividends than PRGSX: RNPEX (0.93) vs PRGSX (0.12). PRGSX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: PRGSX (31 years) vs RNPEX (24 years). PRGSX (0.81) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.75). PRGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 172.20 vs. RNPEX (23.00). RNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRGSX: RNPEX (250) vs PRGSX (2500). PRGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.90 vs. RNPEX (13.27). PRGSX return over 5 years is better than : 20.06 vs. RNPEX (15.70).
| PRGSX | RNPEX | PRGSX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.75 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.75 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.709 | 6.434 | 368% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.02B | 172B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.93 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.90 | 13.27 | 240% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.81 | 41.47 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.06 | 15.70 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 235.53 | 122.92 | 192% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement