Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRGSX vs RNPEX
PRGSX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts PRGSX vs RNPEX
PRGSX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRGSX vs. RNPEX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRGSX is a Buy and RNPEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. PRGSX (8.31B). RNPEX pays higher dividends than PRGSX: RNPEX (0.95) vs PRGSX (0.13). PRGSX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: PRGSX (31 years) vs RNPEX (24 years). PRGSX (0.81) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.75). PRGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 172.20 vs. RNPEX (23.00). RNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRGSX: RNPEX (250) vs PRGSX (2500). PRGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.44 vs. RNPEX (6.62). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 11.98 vs. PRGSX (11.30).
| PRGSX | RNPEX | PRGSX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.75 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.75 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.192 | 4.902 | 310% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.31B | 170B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 0.95 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.44 | 6.62 | 248% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.69 | 33.41 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.30 | 11.98 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 186.67 | 104.80 | 178% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement