Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRGSX vs RNPFX
PRGSX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts PRGSX vs RNPFX
PRGSX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
A.I.Advisor
published Highlights
Market Cap
The average market capitalization across the group is 87.14B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 8.42B to 165.87B. RNPFX holds the highest valuation in this group at 165.87B. The lowest valued company is PRGSX at 8.42B.
High and low price notable news
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was -1%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was -0%, and the average quarterly price growth was 14%. RNPFX experienced the highest price growth at -0%, while PRGSX experienced the biggest fall at -3%.
Volume
The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 0% and the average quarterly volume growth was 0%
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
PRGSX vs. RNPFX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRGSX is a Buy and RNPFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 166B vs. PRGSX (8.42B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than PRGSX: RNPFX (1.18) vs PRGSX (0.12). PRGSX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: PRGSX (31 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). PRGSX (0.81) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). PRGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 172.20 vs. RNPFX (23.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRGSX: RNPFX (250) vs PRGSX (2500). PRGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.24 vs. RNPFX (7.45). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 11.98 vs. PRGSX (10.17).
| PRGSX | RNPFX | PRGSX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.45 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.45 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.976 | 7.684 | 247% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.42B | 166B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 1.18 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.24 | 7.45 | 258% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.10 | 41.65 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.17 | 11.98 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 190.96 | 109.32 | 175% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement