Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRMSX vs RNWBX
PRMSX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts PRMSX vs RNWBX
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock
Price$38.63
Change+$0.46 (+1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.24B
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.41
Change+$0.71 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.98B
PRMSX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRMSX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRMSX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70B vs. PRMSX (5.24B). PRMSX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: PRMSX (0.31) vs RNWBX (0.13). PRMSX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: PRMSX (30 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than PRMSX (1.22). PRMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.10 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRMSX: RNWBX (250) vs PRMSX (2500). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.48 vs. PRMSX (14.39). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 21.46 vs. PRMSX (-15.05).
| PRMSX | RNWBX | PRMSX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.67 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.67 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.529 | 16.125 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.24B | 70B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.13 | 243% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.39 | 17.48 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.80 | 30.84 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.05 | 21.46 | -70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.52 | 64.57 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers