Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRMSX vs RNWBX
PRMSX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts PRMSX vs RNWBX
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock
Price$39.35
Change-$0.23 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.39B
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.39
Change-$0.04 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.77B
PRMSX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRMSX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRMSX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. PRMSX (5.39B). PRMSX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: PRMSX (0.31) vs RNWBX (0.13). PRMSX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: PRMSX (30 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than PRMSX (1.22). PRMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.10 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRMSX: RNWBX (250) vs PRMSX (2500). PRMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.44 vs. RNWBX (10.83). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 17.82 vs. PRMSX (-14.42).
| PRMSX | RNWBX | PRMSX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.67 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.67 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.686 | 17.458 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.39B | 71.8B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.13 | 243% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.44 | 10.83 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.59 | 34.80 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.42 | 17.82 | -81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.93 | 79.12 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers