Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRMSX vs RNWBX
PRMSX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts PRMSX vs RNWBX
PRMSX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRMSX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRMSX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. PRMSX (7.38B). PRMSX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: PRMSX (0.45) vs RNWBX (0.41). PRMSX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: PRMSX (31 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than PRMSX (1.23). PRMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.20 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRMSX: RNWBX (250) vs PRMSX (2500). PRMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 63.81 vs. RNWBX (29.69). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 15.20 vs. PRMSX (9.22).
| PRMSX | RNWBX | PRMSX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.66 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.66 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.751 | 18.201 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.38B | 90.9B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.41 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 63.81 | 29.69 | 215% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.22 | 52.51 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.22 | 15.20 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.46 | 122.04 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement