Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRMSX vs RNWBX
PRMSX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts PRMSX vs RNWBX
PRMSX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRMSX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRMSX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. PRMSX (6.66B). PRMSX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: PRMSX (0.47) vs RNWBX (0.42). PRMSX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: PRMSX (31 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than PRMSX (1.23). PRMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.20 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRMSX: RNWBX (250) vs PRMSX (2500). PRMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.07 vs. RNWBX (20.43). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 12.95 vs. PRMSX (7.86).
| PRMSX | RNWBX | PRMSX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.66 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.66 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.469 | 13.344 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.66B | 90.7B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.42 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.07 | 20.43 | 216% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.66 | 39.93 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.86 | 12.95 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.98 | 98.57 | 75% |